Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:10:16.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micro Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluoresence Mapping of Enamel and Dental Materials after Chemical Erosion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2012

Luís Eduardo Silva Soares*
Affiliation:
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, Research and Development Institute, IP&D Laboratory of Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy, LEVB, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, Faculty of Healt Sciences, FCS, School of Dentistry, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
Rodrigo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, Research and Development Institute, IP&D Laboratory of Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy, LEVB, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
Sídnei Nahórny
Affiliation:
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, Research and Development Institute, IP&D Laboratory of Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy, LEVB, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
Ana Maria do Espírito Santo
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal de São Paulo/UNIFESP, Depto de Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Diadema, São Paulo, Brazil
Airton Abrahão Martin
Affiliation:
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba, UNIVAP, Research and Development Institute, IP&D Laboratory of Biomedical Vibrational Spectroscopy, LEVB, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence was employed to test the hypothesis that beverage consumption or mouthwash utilization will change the chemical properties of dental materials and enamel mineral content. Bovine enamel samples (n = 45) each received two cavity preparations (n = 90), each pair filled with one of three dental materials (R: nanofilled composite resin; GIC: glass-ionomer cement; RMGIC: resin-modified GIC). Furthermore, they were treated with three different solutions (S: saliva; E: erosion/Pepsi Twist®; or EM: erosion+mouthwash/Colgate Plax®). It was found that mineral loss in enamel was greater in GICE samples than in RE > RMGICE > RMGICEM > REM > GICEM. An increased percentage of Zr was found in REM indicating organic matrix degradation. Dental materials tested (R, GIC, and RMGIC) were not able to protect adjacent enamel from acid erosion by the soft drink tested. The use of mouthwash promoted protection of enamel after erosion by the soft drink. To avoid chemical dissolution by mouthwashes, protection by resin composites with surface sealants is recommended.

Type
Biological Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaechi, B.T. & Higham, S.M. (2005). Dental erosion: Possible approaches to prevention and control. J Dent 33, 243252.Google Scholar
Colucci, V., Dos Santos, C.D., Do Amaral, F.L., Corona, S.A. & Catirse, A.B. (2009). Influence of NaHCO3 powder on translucency of microfilled composite resin immersed in different mouthrinses. J Esthet Restor Dent 21, 242248.Google Scholar
De Carvalho Filho, A.C.B., Sanches, R.P., Martin, A.A., Do Espírito Santo, A.M. & Soares, L.E.S. (2011). Energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry study of the protective effects of fluoride varnish and gel on enamel erosion. Microsc Res Tech 74, 839844.Google Scholar
Dos Santos, P.A., Garcia, P.P.N.S., De Oliveira, A.L.B.M., Chinelatti, M.A. & Palma-Dibb, R.G. (2010). Chemical and morphological features of dental composite resin: Influence of light curing units and immersion media. Microsc Res Tech 73, 176181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francisconi, L.F., Honório, H.M., Rios, D., Magalhães, A.C., Machado, M.A. & Buzalaf, M.A. (2008). Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials. Operat Dent 33, 203208.Google Scholar
Gurdal, P., Güniz, A.B. & Hakan, S.B. (2002). The effects of mouthrinses on microhardness and colour stability of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 29, 895901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heurich, E., Beyer, M., Jandt, K.D., Reichert, J., Herold, V., Schnabelrauch, M. & Sigusch, B.W. (2010). Quantification of dental erosion—A comparison of stylus profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Dent Mater 26, 326336.Google Scholar
Honório, H.M., Rios, D., Francisconi, L.F., Magalhães, A.C., Machado, M.A.A.M. & Buzalaf, M.A.R. (2008). Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 35, 947953.Google Scholar
Hooper, S.M., Newcombe, R.G., Faller, R., Eversole, S., Addy, M. & West, N.X. (2007). The protective effects of toothpaste against erosion by orange juice: Studies in situ and in vitro . J Dent 35, 476481.Google Scholar
Mante, F., Salleh, N. & Mante, M. (1993). Softening patterns of post-cure heat-treated dental composites. Dent Mater 9, 325331.Google Scholar
McKenzie, M.A., Linden, R.W.A. & Nicholson, J.W. (2003). The physical properties of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomater 24, 40634069.Google Scholar
McKenzie, M.A., Linden, R.W.A. & Nicholson, J.W. (2004). The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and ‘compomers.’ J Oral Rehabil 31, 10461052.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lueckel, H. & Tschoppe, P. (2010). Effect of fluoride gels and mouthrinses in combination with saliva substitutes on demineralised bovine enamel in vitro . J Dent 38, 641647.Google Scholar
Moi, G.P., Tenuta, L.M.A. & Cury, J.A. (2008). Anticaries potential of a fluoride mouthrinse evaluated in vitro by validated protocols. Braz Dent J 19, 9196.Google Scholar
Rios, D., Honório, H.M., Francisconi, L.F., Magalhães, A.C., Machado, M.A.A.M. & Buzalaf, M.A.R. (2008). In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials. J Dent 36, 152157.Google Scholar
Settembrini, L., Penugonda, B., Scherer, W., Strassler, H. & Hittelman, E. (1995). Alcohol-containing mouthwashes: Effect on composite color. Operat Dent 20, 1417.Google Scholar
Sideridou, I.D., Karabela, M.M. & Vouvoudi, E.C. (2008). Dynamic thermomechanical properties and sorption characteristics of two commercial light cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater 24, 737743.Google Scholar
Soares, L.E.S., Cortez, L.R., Zarur, R.O. & Martin, A.A. (2012). Scanning electron microscopy and roughness study of dental composite degradation. Microsc Microanal 18, 16.Google Scholar
Soares, L.E.S., Santo, A.M.D., Brugnera, A., Zanin, F.A.A. & Martin, A.A. (2009). Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation and manipulation treatments on dentin components, part 2: Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry study. J Biomed Opt 14, 024002-1024002-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wan Bakar, W.Z. & McIntyre, J. (2008). Susceptibility of selected tooth-coloured dental materials to damage by common erosive acids. Austr Dent J 53, 226234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X.Y. & Yap, A.U.J. (2010). Effects of environmental calcium and phosphate on wear and strength of glass ionomers exposed to acidic conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88, 458464.Google Scholar
Yap, A.U.J., Pek, Y.S. & Cheang, P. (2003). Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehab 30, 18.Google Scholar
Yeh, S.T., Wang, H.T., Liao, H.Y., Su, S.L., Chang, C.C., Kao, H.C. & Lee, B.S. (2011). The roughness, microhardness, and surface analysis of nanocomposites after application of topical fluoride gels. Dent Mater 27, 187196.Google Scholar
Zheng, J., Xiao, F., Qian, L.M. & Zhou, Z.R. (2009). Erosion behavior of human tooth enamel in citric acid solution. Tribology Int 42, 15581564.Google Scholar