Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T21:51:03.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of X-ray Emission Efficiency for K-lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2004

M. Procop
M. Procop
Affiliation:
Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), D-12200 Berlin, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Results for the X-ray emission efficiency (counts per C per sr) of K-lines for selected elements (C, Al, Si, Ti, Cu, Ge) and for the first time also for compounds and alloys (SiC, GaP, AlCu, TiAlC) are presented. An energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) of known detection efficiency (counts per photon) has been used to record the spectra at a takeoff angle of 25° determined by the geometry of the secondary electron microscope's specimen chamber. Overall uncertainty in measurement could be reduced to 5 to 10% in dependence on the line intensity and energy. Measured emission efficiencies have been compared with calculated efficiencies based on models applied in standardless analysis. The widespread XPP and PROZA models give somewhat too low emission efficiencies. The best agreement between measured and calculated efficiencies could be achieved by replacing in the modular PROZA96 model the original expression for the ionization cross section by the formula given by Casnati et al. (1982) A discrepancy remains for carbon, probably due to the high overvoltage ratio.

Keywords

X-ray spectrometryX-ray emissionX-ray yieldelectron probe microanalysisEPMAstandardless analysis
Type
Microanalysis
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , August 2004 , pp. 481 - 490
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, D. & Ulm, G. (1992). Electron storage ring BESSY as a source of calculable spectral photon flux in the X-ray region. Rev Sci Instr 63, 1539–1542.Google Scholar
Bastin, G.F., Dijkstra, J.M., & Heijligers, H.J.M. (1998). PROZA96: An improved matrix correction program for electron probe microanalysis, based on a double Gaussian Φ(ρz) approach. X-ray Spectrom 27, 3–10.Google Scholar
Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (2003). BAM-CRM catalogue, http://www.bam.de/english/service/reference_materials/reference_materials.htm.
Casnati, E., Tartari, A., & Baraldi, C. (1982). An empirical approach to K-shell ionisation cross section by electrons. J Phys B 15, 155–167.Google Scholar
Chang, C.C. (1977). Intensity variations in Auger spectra caused by diffraction. Appl Phys Lett 31, 304–306.Google Scholar
Center of X-ray Optics. (2002). http://www-cxro.lbl.gov/optical_constants/atten2.html.
Green, M. & Cosslett, V.E. (1961). The efficiency of production of characteristic X-radiation in thick targets of pure elements. Proc Phys Soc 78, 1206–1219.Google Scholar
Green, M. & Cosslett, V.E. (1968). Measurements of K, L, and M shell X-ray production efficiencies. Brit J Appl Phys (J Phys D), Ser. 2, 1, 425–436.Google Scholar
Gryzinski, M. (1965). Classical theory of atomic collisions. I. Theory of inelastic collisions. Phys Rev 138, A336–A358.Google Scholar
Institute of Reference Materials and Measurements. (2003). http://www.irmm.jrc.be.
International Standards Organization. (2002). International Standard ISO 15632 Microbeam analysis—Instrumental specification for energy dispersive X-ray spectrometers with semiconductor detectors. ISO.
Joy, D.C. (1998). The efficiency of X-ray production at low energies. J Microscopy 191, 74–82.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C. (2001). A database of electron-solid interactions. http://web.utk.edu/∼srcutk/htm/interact.htm.
Joy, D.C. (2002). Improving matrix corrections. Mikrochim Acta 138, 105–113.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C., Luo, S. Gauvin, R. Hovington, P., & Evans, N. (1996). Experimental measurement of electron stopping power at low energies. Scan Microsc 10, 653–666.Google Scholar
Krause, M.O. (1979). Atomic radiative and radiationless yields for K and L shells. J Chem Phys Ref Data 9, 307–327.Google Scholar
Lifshin, E., Ciccarelli, M.F., & Bolon, R. (1980). New measurements of the voltage dependence of absolute X-ray yields. In Proc. 8th ICXOM, Boston 1977, Beaman, D.R., Ogilvie, R.E. & Wittry, D.B. (Eds.), pp. 141–148. Midland, MI: Pendell Publishers.
Maenhaut, W. & Raemdonck, H. (1984). Accurate calibration of a Si(Li) detector for PIXE analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods B 1, 123–136.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.-L. (1994). Standardless X-ray analysis of bulk specimen, Mikrochim Acta 114/115, 33–52.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.-L. & Pichoir, F. (1991). Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP.” In Electron Probe Quantitation, Heinrich, K.F.J. & Newbury, D. (Eds.), pp. 31–75. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Procop, M. (1999). Estimation of absorbing layer thicknesses for an Si(Li) detector. X-ray Spectrom 28, 33–40.Google Scholar
Reed, S.J.B. (1993). Electron Microprobe Analysis, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Scholze, F., Krumrey, M., Müller, P., & Fuchs, D. (1994). Plane grating monochromator beamline for VUV radiometry. Rev Sci Instr 65, 3229–3232.Google Scholar
Scholze, F. & Procop, M. (2001). Measurement of detection efficiency and response functions for an Si(Li) x-ray spectrometer in the range 0.1–5 keV. X-ray Spectrom 30, 69–76.Google Scholar
Schwinger, J. (1949). On the classical radiation of accelerated electrons. Phys Rev 75, 1912–1925.Google Scholar
Scott, V.D. & Love, G. (1991). An EPMA correction method based upon a quadrilateral Φ(ρz) profile. In Electron Probe Quantitation, Heinrich, K.F.J. & Newbury, D. (Eds.), pp. 19–30. New York, London: Plenum Press.
Seah, M.P. & Gilmore, I.S. (1998). Quantitative AES VII. The ionisation cross-section in AES. Surf Interface Anal 26, 815–825.Google Scholar
Verein Deutscher Eisenhüttenleute. (1998). Round robin test 002, Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis of TiAlC and TiCN. Special report 6.021. Dusseldorf, Germany: Verein Deutscher Eisenhüttenleute (in German).
Wernisch, J. & Röhrbacher, K. (1998). Standardless analysis. Mikrochim Acta Suppl. 15, 307–316.Google Scholar