Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:42:22.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ TEM Study of Straining of Free Standing Nickel Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

W.-A. Chiou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208
R. Mitra
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208
Get access

Extract

In situ dynamic experiments in the TEM provide a powerful and unique method of investigating materials, when they are subjected to different environments or treatments. Study of plastic deformation mechanisms of free standing thin metallic films have evoked strong research interest in recent years. In the past, free standing thin metallic films have been tested in tension, where the tensile properties were measured and compared with those of bulk samples. Certain other studies dealt with metallic films attached to the substrate, where the deformation was introduced by thermal cycling or mechanical straining. The deformaion of bulk nanocrystalline samples has also been extensively studied recently. However, few publications have documented in situ straining of free standing metallic films with ultrafine grain size. In this study, an in situ straining stage was employed in the TEM to deform a free standing thin nickel film with grain sizes in submicron and nanocrystalline range, and the goal was to observe the microstructural response to deformation.

Type
Films and Coatings
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Dahlgren, S. D. etal, Thin Solid Films, 40(1977) 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Josell, D. et al, J. Mater. Res., 13 (1998) 2902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Keller-Flaig, R.M., J. Mater. Res., 14 (1999) 4673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jawaram, D. et al, J. Appl. Phys., 82 (1997) 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Weertman, J. R. et al, MRS Bull., 24 (2) (1999) 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. This research made use of Materials Research Center facilities at Northwestern University, supported by NSF under grant #DMR-9632742.Google Scholar