Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T06:57:22.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imaging Mechanisms in Dynamic Force Microscopy of Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Greg D. Haugstad
Affiliation:
Center for Interfacial Engineering, and Department of Chemistry University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota55455, USA
Jon A. Hammerschmidt
Affiliation:
Center for Interfacial Engineering, and Department of Chemistry University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota55455, USA
Wayne L. Gladfelter
Affiliation:
Center for Interfacial Engineering, and Department of Chemistry University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota55455, USA
Get access

Extract

Applications of scanning force microscopy (SFM) in polymer studies have flourished in this decade, reflecting (a) the power of SFM to image both structure and propertiesdown to the nanometer scale, and (b) the low cost and ease of getting useful results in ambient environments. One difficulty in SFM of polymers has been damage incurred by soft materials during the imaging process. The problem was alleviated by the development of special dynamic modes of operation, in which the probe spends little or no time in contact with the polymer surface. Such modes were dubbed “tapping”, “intermittent-contact”, “non-contact”, “near-contact”, etc. As studies proliferated, it became apparent that different researchers were using different terms to refer to the same apparent imaging mechanism, or the same term to refer to different imaging mechanisms. This quandary derived from a poor understanding of exactly how the SFM probe interacts with the sample surface.1-3,5

Type
Developments In Scanned Probe Microscopy of Polymers
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.)Anczykowski, B., Kruger, D., Babcock, K. L. and Fuchs, H., Ultramicroscopy 66, 251 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.)Kuhle, A., Sorensen, A. H. and Bohr, J., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6562 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.)Garcia, R., Tamayo, J., Calleja, M. and Garcia, F., Appl Phys. A 66, S309 (1998).Google Scholar
4.)Brandsch, R., Bar, G. and Whangbo, M. -H., Langmuir 13, 6349 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.)Haugstad, G. and Jones, R. R., Ultramicroscopy (in press).Google Scholar
6.)Spatz, J. P., Seiko, S., Moller, M., Winkler, R. G., Reineker, P. and Marti, O., Langmuir 13, 4699 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar