Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:30:09.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of Organic Binders in Ancient Chinese Paintings by Immunological Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Wenjing Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P.R. China
Hui Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, P.R. China
Bingjian Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P.R. China Department of Cultural Heritage and Museology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, P.R. China
*
*Corresponding author.[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The identification and localization of organic binders in artworks are big challenges in archaeology and conservation science. Immunological techniques, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) have the potential to become powerful tools for the analysis of organic materials in ancient samples. In this study, ELISA and IFM techniques were combined to identify chicken ovalbumin, glue from several mammalian species, bovine milk, and fish glue in ancient Chinese painting samples. As binders, egg ovalbumin was found in two painting samples and animal glue was found in three samples, which were dated from the 4th to 8th centuries. The results clearly demonstrate that ELISA and IFM can be used to validate results from ancient samples.

Type
Biological Applications
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arslanoglu, J., Zaleski, S. & Loike, J. (2011). An improved method of protein localization in artworks through SERS nanotag-complexed antibodies. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 29973010.Google Scholar
Bonaduce, I., Blaensdorf, C., Dietemann, P. & Colombini, M.P. (2008). The binding media of the polychromy of Qin Shihuang’s Terracotta army. J Cultur Herit 9, 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartechini, L., Vagnini, M., Palmieri, M., Pitzurra, L., Mello, T., Mazurek, J. & Chiari, G. (2010). Immunodetection of proteins in ancient paint media. Acc Chem Res 43, 867876.Google Scholar
Casoli, A., Musini, P.C. & Palla, G. (1996). Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric to the problem of characterizing binding media in paintings. J Chromatogr A 731, 237246.Google Scholar
Colombini, M.P. & Modugno, F. (2004). Characterisation of proteinaceous binders in artistic paintings by chromatographic techniques. J Sep Sci 27, 147160.Google Scholar
Gambino, M., Cappitelli, F., Cattò, C., Carpen, A., Principi, P., Ghezzi, L., Bonaduce, I., Galano, E., Pucci, P., Birolo, L., Villa, F. & Forlani, F. (2013). A simple and reliable methodology to detect egg white in art samples. J Biosci 38, 397408.Google Scholar
Heginbotham, A., Millay, V. & Quick, M. (2004). The use of immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as complementary techniques for protein identification in artists’ materials. J Am Inst Conserv 45, 89106.Google Scholar
Hu, W., Zhang, K., Zhang, H., Zhang, B. & Rong, B. (2015). Analysis of polychromy binder on Qin Shihuang’s Terracotta Warriors by immunofluorescence microscopy. J Cultur Herit 16, 244248.Google Scholar
Kockaert, L., Gausset, P. & Dubi-Rucquoy, M. (1989). Detection of ovalbumin in paint media by immunofluorescence. Stud Conserv 34, 183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuckova, S., Sandu, I.C.A., Crhova, M., Hynek, R., Fogas, I., Muralha, V.S. & Sandu, A.V. (2013). Complementary cross-section based protocol of investigation of polychrome samples of a 16th century Moravian Sculpture by optical, vibrational and mass spectrometric techniques. Microchem J 110, 538544.Google Scholar
Kuckova, S., Sandu, I.C.A., Crhova, M., Hynek, R., Fogas, I. & Schafer, S. (2013). Protein identification and localization using mass spectrometry and staining tests in cross-sections of polychrome samples. J Cultur Herit 14, 3137.Google Scholar
Li, S. (1990). The application of HPLC technology on the analysis of mural binders. Dunhuang Res 4, 53.Google Scholar
Li, Z.X. (1990). The primary exploration of binders in Dunhuang murals. Dunhuang Res 3, 69.Google Scholar
Łojewski, T., Bagniuk, J., Kołodziej, A. & Łojewska, J. (2011). Reflective and photoacoustic infrared spectroscopic techniques in assessment of binding media in paintings. Appl Phys A 105, 753761.Google Scholar
Magrini, D., Bracci, S. & Sandu, I.C.A. (2013). Fluorescence of organic binders in painting cross-sections. Procedia Chem 8, 194201.Google Scholar
Mazzeo, R., Prati, S., Quaranta, M., Joseph, E., Kendix, E. & Galeotti, M. (2008). Attenuated total reflection micro FTIR characterisation of pigment-binder interaction in reconstructed paint films. Anal Bioanal Chem 392, 6576.Google Scholar
Palmieri, M., Vagnini, M., Pitzurra, L., Brunetti, B.G. & Cartechini, L. (2013). Identification of animal glue and hen-egg yolk in paintings by use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 63656371.Google Scholar
Palmieri, M., Vagnini, M., Pitzurra, L., Rocchi, P., Brunetti, B.G., Sgamellotti, A. & Cartechini, L. (2011). Development of an analytical protocol for a fast, sensitive and specific protein recognition in paintings by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 30113023.Google Scholar
Potenza, M., Sabatino, G., Giambi, F., Rosi, L., Papini, A.M. & Dei, L. (2013). Analysis of egg-based model wall paintings by use of an innovative combined dot-ELISA and UPLC-based approach. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 691701.Google Scholar
Richter, W., Krause, I., Graf, C., Sperrer, I., Schwarzer, C. & Klostermeyer, H. (1997). An indirect competitive ELISA for the detection of cows’ milk and caseinate in goats’ and ewes’ milk and cheese using polyclonal antibodies against bovine γ-caseins. Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und -Forschung A 204, 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosi, F., Federici, A., Brunetti, B.G., Sgamellotti, A., Clementi, S. & Miliani, C. (2011). Multivariate chemical mapping of pigments and binders in easel painting cross-sections by micro IR reflection spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 399, 31333145.Google Scholar
Sandu, I.C.A., Schäfer, S., Magrini, D., Bracci, S. & Roque, C.A. (2012). Cross-section and staining-based techniques for investigation of organic materials in polychrome works of art: A review. Microsc Microanal 18, 860875.Google Scholar
Schulz, H. & Kropp, B. (1993). Micro spectroscopy FTIR reflectance examination of paint binders on ground chalk. Fresenius’ J Anal Chem 346, 114122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spring, M., Ricci, C., Peggie, D.A. & Kazarian, S.G. (2008). ATR-FTIR imaging for the analysis of organic materials in paint cross sections: Case studies on paint samples from the National Gallery, London. Anal Bioanal Chem 392, 3745.Google Scholar
Su, B.M., Zhen, B.Z.F., Hu, Z.D. & Li, Z.X. (2005). HPLC analysis of binding medium of pigments of wall-painting at Kizil Grottoes. Dunhuang Res 4, 57.Google Scholar
Tokarski, C., Crenolive, C. & Rolando, C. (2003). Protein studies in cultural heritage, In Molecular biology and cultural heritage: Swets & Zeitlinger, Saiz-Jimenez, C. (Ed.), pp. 119130.Google Scholar
Vagnini, M., Pitzurra, L., Cartechini, L., Miliani, C., Brunetti, B.G. & Sgamellotti, A. (2008). Identification of proteins in painting cross-sections by immunofluorescence microscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 392, 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L., Yang, L., Zhou, W. & Fan, X. (2011). Comparison and evaluation of methods for quantitative analysis of proteins in wall paintings and colored relics of ancient architecture. Sci Conserv Archaeol 23, 5963.Google Scholar
Wei, S.Y., Ma, Q.L. & Schreiner, M. (2012). Scientific investigation of the paint and adhesive materials used in the western Han dynasty polychromy terracotta army, Qingzhou, China. J Archaeol Sci 39, 16281633.Google Scholar