Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:08:20.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fast Amplitude Modulation Detector for Scanning Force Microscopy with High Q Factor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2012

Yizhi Shi
Affiliation:
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China
Qingyou Lu*
Affiliation:
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, People's Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Amplitude modulation (AM) scanning force microscopy (SFM) is superior to frequency modulation SFM in simplicity, sensitivity, and stability, but is still replaced by the latter because it is too slow when the Q factor is high (bandwidth < 0.5 Hz for Q > 50,000 and resonant frequency ω0 < 50 kHz). We report a close-loop AM detector that has an 18 Hz bandwidth, better than 1 mHz frequency resolution and excellent response to step frequency changes even for Q ∼ 60,000 and ω0 ∼ 32 kHz. Its superiority is well shown by the comparison of magnetic force microscope images taken under the new and old AM detection modes with the tip and scan area (videotape sample) being unchanged. Also important is that shifting the driving frequency from near the resonance peak to further away from the peak does not decrease the frequency resolution as much as we expect (but can increase the response speed).

Type
Techniques and Equipment Development
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, M., Sugimoto, Y., Namikawa, T., Morita, K., Oyabu, N. & Morita, S. (2007). Drift-compensated data acquisition performed at room temperature with frequency modulation atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 90, 203103.Google Scholar
Albrecht, T.R., Grtitter, P., Horne, D. & Rugar, D. (1991). Frequency modulation detection using highdkantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity. J Appl Phys 69, 668673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennewitz, R., Pfeiffer, O., Schär, S., Barwich, V., Meyer, E. & Kantorovich, L.N. (2002). Atomic corrugation in nc-AFM of alkali halides. Appl Surf Sci 188, 232237.Google Scholar
Giessibl, F.J. (1995). Atomic resolution of the silicon (111)-(7X7) surface by atomic force microscopy. Science 267, 6871.Google Scholar
Jahng, J., Lee, M. & Noh, H. (2007). Active Q control in tuning-fork-based atomic force microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 91, 023103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, K., Yamada, H., Itoh, H., Horiuchi, T. & Matsushige, K. (2001). Analog frequency modulation detector for dynamic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 72, 43834387.Google Scholar
Lu, Q., Chen, C. & de Lozanne, A. (1997). Observation of magnetic domain behavior in colossal magnetoresistive materials with a magnetic force microscope. Science 276, 20062008.Google Scholar
Martin, Y., Williams, C.C. & Wickramasinghe, H.K. (1987). Atomic force microscope-force mapping and profiling on a ssub 100-Å scale. J Appl Phys 61, 47234729.Google Scholar
Minobe, T., Uchihashi, T., Tsukamoto, T., Orisaka, S., Sugawara, Y. & Morita, S. (1999). Distance dependence of noncontact-AFM image contrast on Si(111) $\sqrt 3 \times \sqrt 3 - {\rm Ag}$ structure. Appl Surf Sci 140, 298303.Google Scholar
Müller, D.J., Engel, A., Matthey, U., Meier, T., Dimroth, T. & Suda, K. (2003). Observing membrane protein diffusion at subnanometer resolution. J Mol Biol 327, 925930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, B.A., Ren, J. & Whangbo, M.H. (1991). Relationship of STM and AFM images to the local density of states in the valence and conduction bands of ReSe2 . J Am Chem Soc 113, 78347837.Google Scholar
Schneider, J., Dufrêne, Y.F., Barger, W.R. Jr. & Lee, G.U. (2000). Atomic force microscope image contrast mechanisms on supported lipid bilayers. Biophys J 79, 11071118.Google Scholar
Yang, C.H., Hwang, I., Chen, Y.F., Chang, C.S. & Tsai, D.P. (2007). Imaging of soft matter with tapping-mode atomic force microscopy and noncontact-mode atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 18, 084009.Google Scholar