Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:03:19.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electron Spectroscopic Tomography for Materials Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

G. Möbus  and
B. J. Inkson
G. Möbus
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
B. J. Inkson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Oxford University, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK
Get access

Abstract

Tomographic 3D-reconstructions from tilt series of projections differ in two major aspects when moving from biochemistry (e.g.) to materials science applications: (I) Crystalline inorganic materials fail the weak phase image formation approximation and suffer from dynamic and nonlinear contrast contributions (which depend for both CTEM and HREM on atomic lattice plane orientation). (II) exposure tolerance increases by two orders of magnitude. We therefore propose energy filtered tomography with inelastic electrons (electron spectroscopic imaging, ESI) as a new method for 3D-reconstruction of free or buried subsurface nanostructures or nanoparticles. Energy filters are not used here to improve SNR by removing inelastic background , but to provide the necessary projection relationship between a 3D concentration distribution and the (processed) image intensity. Ideally, a 4-dimensional data space is recorded for a single tilt axis tomography experiment, D=D(δE, Θ,x,y), (with 5E as energy loss, Θ as tilt, and (x,y) as image coordinates). The material has to withstand exposures of T = t × Ntilt × Nloss (t = 5...20sec per image, Ntilt >12 directions, Nloss = 5....20 energy loss values).

Type
Electron Tomography: Recent Advances and Applications (Organized by M. Marko)
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 7 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2001, Microscopy Society of America 59th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 35th Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California August 5-9, 2001 , August 2001 , pp. 84 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nickel, S.et al., Proceed. EUREM12, Brno, Frank, L. & Ciampor, F. eds.,Vol. B (2000)93–96Google Scholar

2. Boehm, J.et al., same volume as [1], pp 119-120 [1+2 published by Czech. Soc. El. Micr.]Google Scholar

3. Inkson, B.J. and Threadgill., P.L., Mat.Sci. & Eng., A258 (1998) 313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Inkson, B.J. and Threadgill., P.L., MRS Proceed, 460(1997)767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Muller, D.A., Proceed. ICEM14, Cancun, HAC Benavides+MJ Yacaman eds., Vol 1 (1998)219Google Scholar

6. Marien, J.et al., J. microscopy, 194(1998)71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Funding by EPSRC (Advanced Fellowship) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank M. Rühle for access to microscopes, and U. Eigenthaler, C. Hehn, R. Höschen, and F. Phillipp for advice.Google Scholar