Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:09:56.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Microscopy in Tumor Diagnosis in 2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Shelburne
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, NC , 27710-3712
D. Howell
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Duke University and VA Medical Centers, Durham, NC , 27710-3712
Get access

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IH) has revolutionized tumor diagnosis in recent years. The antigenic/molecular information now available is extraordinarily helpful not only in clinical diagnostic work, but also in improving our understanding of the cell biology of neoplasia. As a result, there is now less need for diagnostic conventional transmission electron microscopic (CTEM) studies on neoplasms. For example, lymphomas and leukemias are now largely defined by IH and related techniques such as flow cytometry, not CTEM. A postive S-100 stain in the right setting usually obviates the need to search for melanosomes.

However, CTEM is still a useful tool for surgical pathologists. One important advantage CTEM has over IH is that - like gross observations and the classic H&E section - CTEM can detect features not suspected in advance. This property of CTEM makes it particularly valuable in studying complex and unusual patients/tumors.

Type
The Cell Biology of Cancer (Organized by J. Jerome and B. Gunning)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Shelburne, J. D., Annals of Surgery 220 (1994) IGoogle Scholar
2.Dardick, I. and Herrera, G. A., Eds., Human Pathology 29 (1998)1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Turbat-Herrera, E. A. and Knowles, K., Human Pathology 29 (1998) 1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hsi, E. D. et al., Am J Surg Pathol 22 (1998) 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Willis, E. J., Ultrastruct Pathol 17 (1993) 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ordonez, N. G., Am J Surg Pathol 22 (1998) 1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Howell, D. N. et al., Human Pathol 29 (1998) 1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Howell, D. N. and Miller, S. E., Microscopy and Microanalysis 4 Suppl. 2 (1998)1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar