Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:07:28.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Heat Treatment Temperature on the Spinning Structure and Properties of a Cu–Sn Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Jinli Liu ,
Wenyuan Zheng  and
Huiqin Yin
Jinli Liu*
Affiliation:
Automotive Engineering Institute, Xi'an Aeronautical Polytechnic Institute, Xi'an 710000, China
Wenyuan Zheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Technology, Xi'an Siyuan University, Xi'an 710000, China
Huiqin Yin*
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Shanghai201800, China
*
*Author for correspondence: Jinli Liu, E-mail: [email protected]; Huiqin Yin [email protected]
*Author for correspondence: Jinli Liu, E-mail: [email protected]; Huiqin Yin [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A thin-walled copper (Cu)–tin (Sn) alloy cylinder was treated after spinning at 200–400°C for 0.5 h. The characteristics of the alloy microstructure under different temperatures were analyzed through electron back-scattered diffraction. The results were as follows. The grain size at 200–300°C decreases as the heat treatment temperature rises, but the grain size at 400°C increases. At 200–300°C, the microstructure primarily consists of deformed grains. It is found that the main reason for the formation of high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) is static recrystallization. For the grain boundary orientation differential, the low-angle sub-grain boundary gradually grows into the HAGB, and multiple annealing twin Σ9 boundaries appear. Grain orientation is generally random at any temperature range. The mechanical property test indicated that, at the upper critical recrystallization temperature of 300°C, the elongation of the Cu–Sn alloy gradually increases, and its yield strength and ultimate tensile strength rapidly decrease.

Keywords

alloygrain boundarygrain orientationstrengthtexture
Type
Materials Science Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Debin, S, Guoping, Y & Wenchen, X (2009). Deformation history and the resultant microstructure and texture in backward tube spinning of Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1 V. J Mater Process Technol 209(17), 5713–5719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, J, Hang, C, Tian, Y, Wang, C & Liu, B (2018). Effect of electric current on grain orientation and mechanical properties of Cu–Sn intermetallic compounds joints. J Alloys Compd 753, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghiara, G, Spotorno, R, Trasatti, SP & Cristiani, P (2018). Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens on the electrochemical behaviour of a single-phase Cu–Sn modern bronze. Corros Sci 139, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholinia, A & Brough, I (2012). A 3D EBSD investigation of dynamic recrystallisation in a Cu–Sn bronze. Mater Sci Forum 15(S2), 309–325.Google Scholar
Huang, W, Chai, L, Li, Z, Yang, X, Guo, N & Song, B (2016). Evolution of microstructure and grain boundary character distribution of a tin bronze annealed at different temperatures. Mater Charact 114, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, J, ZaiXin, F, Fan, W & Yuan, X (2018). The influence of power spinning and annealing temperature on microstructures and properties of Cu–Sn alloy. Mater Charact 144, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, FJ & Hatherly, M (2004). Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044164-1/50023-2Google Scholar
Liang, CL & Lin, KL (2018). The amorphous interphase formed in an intermetallic-free Cu/Sn couple during early stage electromigration. Scr Mater 155, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, L, Zhang, J, Xu, Y, Zhang, Y, Wang, W & Yang, J (2018). The effect of pressure and orientation on Cu–Cu3Sn interface reliability under isothermal ageing and monotonic traction via molecular dynamics investigation. Mater Design 149, 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, XJ, Wu, C, Yang, MJ, Zhu, JH, Yang, SY, Shi, Z, Lu, Y, Han, JJ & Wang, CP (2018). Phase equilibria in the Cu–Sn–Sb ternary system. J Phase Equilib Diff 39(6), 820–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockyer, SA & Noble, FW (1994). Precipitate structure in a Cu–Ni–Si alloy. J Mater Sci 29(1), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, ZL, Xian, JW, Belyakov, SA & Gourlay, CM (2018). Nucleation and twinning in tin droplet solidification on single crystal intermetallic compounds. Acta Mater 150, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somidin, F, Maeno, H, Salleh, MM, Tran, XQ, McDonald, SD, Matsumura, S & Nogita, K (2018). Characterising the polymorphic phase transformation at a localised point on a Cu6Sn5 grain. Mater Charact 138, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishwanath, SK, Woo, H & Jeon, S (2018). Effect of dysprosium and lutetium metal buffer layers on the resistive switching characteristics of Cu–Sn alloy-based conductive-bridge random access memory. Nanotechnology 29(38), 385207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, G & Xia, Q (2014). Research on the grain refinement method of cylindrical parts by power spinning. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 78(5), 1–9.Google Scholar
Xu, WC, Zhao, XK, Ma, H, Shan, D & Lin, H (2016). Influence of roller distribution modes on spinning force during tube spinning. Int J Mech Sci 113, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L, Zhang, Y, Du, C, Dai, J & Zhang, N (2015). Effect of aluminum concentration on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Sn–Cu–Al solder alloy. Microelectron Reliab 55(3-4), 596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar