Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:43:14.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cryomesh™: A New Substrate for Cryo-Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

Craig Yoshioka
Affiliation:
The National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Bridget Carragher
Affiliation:
The National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Clinton S. Potter*
Affiliation:
The National Resource for Automated Molecular Microscopy, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Here we evaluate a new grid substrate developed by ProtoChips Inc. (Raleigh, NC) for cryo-transmission electron microscopy. The new grids are fabricated from doped silicon carbide using processes adapted from the semiconductor industry. A major motivating purpose in the development of these grids was to increase the low-temperature conductivity of the substrate, a characteristic that is thought to affect the appearance of beam-induced movement (BIM) in transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of biological specimens. BIM degrades the quality of data and is especially severe when frozen biological specimens are tilted in the microscope. Our results show that this new substrate does indeed have a significant impact on reducing the appearance and severity of beam-induced movement in TEM images of tilted cryo-preserved samples. Furthermore, while we have not been able to ascertain the exact causes underlying the BIM phenomenon, we have evidence that the rigidity and flatness of these grids may play a major role in its reduction. This improvement in the reliability of imaging at tilt has a significant impact on using data collection methods such as random conical tilt or orthogonal tilt reconstruction with cryo-preserved samples. Reduction in BIM also has the potential for improving the resolution of three-dimensional cryo-reconstructions in general.

Type
Biological Imaging: Techniques Development and Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Booy, F.P. & Pawley, J.B. (1993). Cryo-crinkling: What happens to carbon films on copper grids at low temperature. Ultramicroscopy 48, 273280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bottcher, B. (1995). Electron cryo-microscopy of graphite in amorphous ice. Ultramicroscopy 58, 417424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, J., Sherman, M.B., Berriman, J. & Chiu, W. (1998). Evaluation of charging on macromolecules in electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 72, 4152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J.Z., Sachse, C., Xu, C., Mielke, T., Spahn, C.M. & Grigorieff, N. (2008). A dose-rate effect in single-particle electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 161, 92100.Google Scholar
Downing, K., Sui, H. & Auer, M. (2007). Electron tomography: A 3D view of the subcellular world. Anal Chem 79, 79497957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubochet, J. & Lepault, J. (1984). Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified water. J Phys Colloques 45, 8494.Google Scholar
Glaeser, R.M. (1985). Electron crystallography of biological macromolecules. Ann Rev Phys Chem 36, 243275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, R.M. (2008). Retrospective: Radiation damage and its associated information limitations. J Struct Biol 163, 271276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaeser, R.M. & Downing, K. (2004). Specimen charging on thin films with one conducting layer: Discussion of physical principles. Microsc Microanal 10, 790796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gyobu, N., Tani, K., Hiroaki, Y., Kamegawa, A., Mitsuoka, K. & Fujiyoshi, Y. (2004). Improved specimen preparation for cryo-electron microscopy using a symmetric carbon sandwich technique. J Struct Biol 146, 325333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, R. (1992). Image contrast in high-resolution electron microscopy of biological macromolecules: TMV in ice. Ultramicroscopy 46, 118.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. & Glaeser, R.M. (1985). Quantitative analysis of image contrast in electron micrographs of beam-sensitive crystals. Ultramicroscopy 16, 139150.Google Scholar
Lander, G.C., Khayat, R., Li, R., Prevelige, P.E., Potter, C.S., Carragher, B. & Johnson, J.E. (2009). The P22 tail machine at subnanometer resolution reveals the architecture of an infection conduit. Structure 17, 789799.Google Scholar
Leschziner, A.E. & Nogales, E. (2006). The orthogonal tilt reconstruction method: An approach to generating single-class volumes with no missing cone for ab initio reconstruction of asymmetric particles. J Struct Biol 153, 284299.Google Scholar
Radermacher, M. (1988). Three-dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. J Elec Microsc Tech 9, 359394.Google Scholar
Rhinow, D. & Kühlbrandt, W. (2008). Electron cryo-microscopy of biological specimens on conductive titanium-silicon metal glass films. Ultramicroscopy 108, 698705.Google Scholar
Stagg, S.M., Lander, G.C., Quispe, J., Voss, N.R., Cheng, A., Bradlow, H., Bradlow, S., Carragher, B. & Potter, C.S. (2008). A test-bed for optimizing high-resolution single particle reconstructions. J Struct Biol 163, 2939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suloway, C., Pulokas, J., Fellmann, D., Cheng, A., Guerra, F., Quispe, J., Stagg, S., Potter, C.S. & Carragher, B. (2005). Automated molecular microscopy: The new Leginon system. J Struct Biol 151, 4160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vonck, J. (2000). Parameters affecting specimen flatness of two-dimensional crystals for electron crystallography. Ultramicroscopy 85, 123129.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, C., Pulokas, J., Fellmann, D., Potter, C.S., Milligan, R.A. & Carragher, B. (2007). Automation of random conical tilt and orthogonal tilt data collection using feature-based correlation. J Struct Biol 159, 335346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed