Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:57:43.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Additive Manufactured and Conventional 316L Stainless Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2015

J. J. H. Lim
Affiliation:
Material Performance Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester (UK)
A. R. C. Malheiros
Affiliation:
Material Performance Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester (UK)
G. Bertali
Affiliation:
Material Performance Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester (UK)
C. J. Long
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Hopkins, SC 29061 (USA)
P. D. Freyer
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 (USA)
M. G. Burke
Affiliation:
Material Performance Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester (UK)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2015 

References

References:

[1] Murr, L. E., et al.. (2012). J. of Mat. Sci. & Tech. 28(1), 114.Google Scholar
[2] NIST, US Department of Commerce May 2013.Google Scholar
[3] Frazier, W. E. (2014). J. of Mat. Eng. & Per. 23(6), 19171928.Google Scholar
[4] Wu, A., et al.. (2014). Met. & Mat. Trans. A 45(13), 62606270.Google Scholar
[5] Niendorf, T., et al.. (2013). Met. & Mat.Trans. B 44(4), 794796.Google Scholar