Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T16:27:51.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Tubercles in Cast Iron Water Distribution Pipes Using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

P. Sarin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL61801
W.M. Kriven
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL61801
V.L. Snoeyink
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL61801
Get access

Extract

Corrosion of cast iron (C.I.) pipe often results in the formation of “tubercles” on the inner surface of the pipe. Tubercles are layered deposits formed by the stacking of several layers of corrosion products one on top of the other (Fig.l). Tubercles not only increase the amount of energy required for transport of water but are also considered the main source of turbidity in potable water. Their chemical and physical characteristics are important factors which affect the release of iron into the bulk water.

Tubercles are extremely complex systems. They may be highly crystalline in nature, with iron occurring in chemical structures, such as siderite (FeCO3), goethite (α-FeOOH), magnetite (Fe3O4) and lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) or they may be highly amorphous. Tubercles vary in height from a few millimeters to a few centimeters. They exhibit distinct layers which are formed over varying periods of time ranging from a few months to a century.

Type
Oxidation, Corrosion, and Protective Coatings
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sontheimer, H.et al., Journal of American Water Works Association, 11(1981)572–910.1002/j.1551-8833.1981.tb04801.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuovinen, O.H.et al., Journal of American Water Works Association, 11(1980)626–35.10.1002/j.1551-8833.1980.tb04599.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
The authors gratefully acknowledge the use of facilities at the Center for Advanced Cementitious Materials, UIUC. This work was sponsored by the American Water Works Association and Research Foundation.Google Scholar