Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:41:50.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Large-Area Silicon Drift Detectors at High Count Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

B.E. Patt
Affiliation:
Photon Imaging, Inc., 19355 Business Center Drive, Suite 8, Northridge, CA9132
J.S. Iwanczyk
Affiliation:
Photon Imaging, Inc., 19355 Business Center Drive, Suite 8, Northridge, CA9132
C.R. Tull
Affiliation:
Photon Imaging, Inc., 19355 Business Center Drive, Suite 8, Northridge, CA9132
Get access

Extract

Silicon Drift Detectors (SDD) are being developed for analytical x-ray spectrometry having large active area, high-energy resolution and capability of operating at high counting rates. The development derives from the charged coupled device (CCD) for light-signal imaging, utilizing the extremely low capacitance of the detector and readout electronics and subsequent developments of silicon drift detectors for high-energy physics applications and more recently, x-ray spectroscopy applications. The now well-known advantage of the drift detector design is that, unlike traditional planar detectors, it allows for relatively large active area while still maintaining a very low anode capacitance (60 fF). This low value of detector capacitance results in a lowering of the series-noise component and hence the overall inherent electronic noise. Additionally, the reduction of the series noise leads to faster optimal shaping time, and as a consequence this provides for extremely high count rates.

Type
New Detectors—Benefits and Drawbacks
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

[1]Gatti, E. and Rehak, P., Nucl. Instr. Meth., Phys. Res. 225, 608 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bertuccio, G., Castoldi, A., Longoni, A., Sampietro, M. and Gauthier, C., Nucl. Instr. Meth., Phys. Res. A312, 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Jalas, P., Niemela, A., Chen, W., Rehak, P., Castold, A. and Longoni, A., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 41, 1048 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Pinnoti, E., Longoni, A., Gambelli, M., Struder, L., Lechner, P., Zanthier, C.V. and Kraner, H., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 42,12(1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Iwanczyk, J.S., Patt, B.E., Vilkelis, G., Rehn, L., Metz, J., Hedman, B. & Hodgson, K., Nucl. Instr. & Meth. in Phys. Res. A380 (1996) 288294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Iwanczyk, J.S., Patt, B.E., Tull, C.R., and MacDonald, L.R., SPIE Conf. On Hard X-Ray, Gamma-Ray, and Neutron Detector Physics, Denver, CO, July 1999. SPIE Vol. 3768, 249 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar