Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:27:37.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Healthy and Fluorotic Enamel by Atomic Force Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2010

Verónica Zavala-Alonso ,
Gabriel A. Martínez-Castanon ,
Nuria Patiño-Marín ,
Humberto Terrones ,
Kenneth Anusavice  and
Juan P. Loyola-Rodríguez
Verónica Zavala-Alonso
Affiliation:
Advanced General Dentistry Program, San Luis Potosí University, México
Gabriel A. Martínez-Castanon
Affiliation:
Advanced General Dentistry Program, San Luis Potosí University, México
Nuria Patiño-Marín
Affiliation:
Advanced General Dentistry Program, San Luis Potosí University, México
Humberto Terrones
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Nanoscience, Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials Department, IPICYT, San Luis Potosi, SLP, Mexico
Kenneth Anusavice
Affiliation:
Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
Juan P. Loyola-Rodríguez*
Affiliation:
Advanced General Dentistry Program, San Luis Potosí University, México
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim was to characterize the external structure, roughness, and absolute depth profile (ADP) of fluorotic enamel compared with healthy enamel. Eighty extracted human molars were classified into four groups [TFI: 0, control (C); 1–3, mild (MI); 4–5, moderate (MO); 6–9, severe fluorosis (S)] according to the Thylstrup-Fejerskov Index (TFI). All samples were analyzed by atomic force microscopy.

The mean values of enamel surface roughness (ESR) in nm were: Group C, 92.6; Group MI, 188.8; Group MO, 246.9; and Group S, 532.2. The mean values of absolute depth profile in nm were: C, 1,065.7; MI, 2,360.7; MO, 2,536.7; and S, 6,146.2. The differences between mean ESR and mean ADP among groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). This structural study confirms at the nanometer level that there is a positive association between fluorosis severity, ESR, and ADP, and there is an association with the clinical findings of fluorosis measured by TFI as well.

Keywords

healthy enamelfluorotic enamelAFM
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 16 , Issue 5 , October 2010 , pp. 531 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abanto-Alvarez, J., Rezende, K., Salazar-Marocho, S., Alves, F., Celiberti, P. & Ciamponi, A. (2009). Dental fluorosis: Exposure, prevention and management. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 1, 103–107.Google Scholar
Angmar-Månsson, B., Jong, E., Sundstrom, F. & Bosch, J. (1994). Strategies for improving the assessment of dental fluorosis: Focus on optical techniques. Adv Dent Res 8, 75–79.Google Scholar
Batina, N., Renugopalakrishnan, V., Casillas Lavin, P.N., Guerrero, J.CH., Morales, M., Garduño-Juarez, R. & Lakka, S.L. (2004). Ultrastructure of dental enamel afflicted with hypoplasia: An atomic force miscroscopic study. Calcif Tissue Int 74, 294–301.Google Scholar
Brès, E.F. & Hutchison, J.L. (2002). Surface structure study of biological calcium phosphate apatite crystals from human tooth enamel. J Biomed Mater Res 63, 433–440.Google Scholar
Burt, B.A. (1992). The changing patterns of systemic fluoride intake. J Dent Res 71, 1228–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, D.C. (1994). Trends in prevalence of dental fluorosis in North America. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22, 148–152.Google Scholar
Everett, E.T., McHenry, M.A., Reynolds, N., Eggertsson, H., Sullivan, J., Kantmann, C., Martinez-Mier, E.A., Warrick, J.M. & Stookey, G.M. (2002). Dental fluorosis: Variability among different inbred mouse strains. J Dent Res 81, 794–798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fejerskov, O., Larsen, M.J., Richards, A. & Baelum, V. (1994). Dental tissue effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 8, 15–31.Google Scholar
Fejerskov, O., Manji, F., Baelum, V. & Moller, I.J. (1988). Dental fluorosis: A Handbook for Health Workers. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Garcia, A.I. (1989). Caries incidence and costs of prevention programs. J Public Health Dent 49, 259–271.Google Scholar
Grimaldo, M., Borja-Aburto, V., Ramírez, A., Ponce, M., Rosas, M. & Díaz-Barriga, F. (1995). Endemic fluorosis in San Luis Potosí, México. Identification of risk factors associated with human exposure to fluoride. Environ Res 68, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habelitz, S., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W. Jr. & Balooch, M. (2001). Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Bio 46, 173–183.Google Scholar
Kirkham, J., Brookes, S.J., Shore, R.C., Bonass, W.A., Smith, D.A., Wallwork, M.L. & Robinson, C. (1998). Atomic force microscopy studies of crystal surface topology during enamel development. Connect Tissue Res 38, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klapetek, P., Ohlidal, I. & Bilek, J. (2004). Influence of the atomic force microscope tip on the multifractal analysis of rough surfaces. Ultramicroscopy 102, 51–59.Google Scholar
Li, Y.J., Zhao, B.R., Yao, B., Ge, L.H., Yao, J.X. & Shi, G.S. (1993). The characters on histopathological changes in dental fluorosis. Shanghai J Stomatol 2, 218–220.Google Scholar
Loyola-Rodríguez, J.P., Zavala-Alonso, V., Reyes-Vela, E., Patiño-Marin, N., Ruiz, F. & Anusavice, K.J. (2010). Atomic force microscopy observation of enamel roughness and depth profile after phosphoric acid etching. J Elect Microsc (Tokyo) 59(2), 119–125.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, A.K. (2000). Risk factors for dental fluorosis: A review of the recent literature. Pediatr Dent 22, 269–277.Google ScholarPubMed
Pendrys, D.G. (2000). Risk of enamel fluorosis in nonfluoridated and optimally fluoridated populations: Considerations for the dental professional. J Am Dent Assoc 131, 746–755.Google Scholar
Richards, A., Likimani, S., Baelum, V. & Fejerskov, O. (1992). Fluoride concentrations in unerupted fluorotic human enamel. Caries Res 26, 328–332.Google Scholar
Schaad, P., Paris, E., Cuisinier, F.J. & Voegel, J.C. (1993). Atomic force microscopy study of human tooth enamel surfaces. Scanning Microsc 7, 1149–1152.Google Scholar
Shrout, P.E. & Fleiss, J.L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull 2, 420–428.Google Scholar
Thylstrup, A. & Fejerskov, O. (1978). Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 6, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieira, A., Hancock, R., Limeback, H., Maia, R. & Grynpas, M. (2004). Is fluoride concentration in dentin and enamel a good indicator of dental fluorosis? J Dent Res 83, 76–80.Google Scholar
Vieira, A., Hancock, R., Limeback, H., Schawartz, M. & Grynpas, M. (2003). How does fluoride concentration in the tooth affect apatite crystal size? J Dent Res 82, 909–913.Google Scholar
Vitkov, L., Kastner, M., Kienberger, F., Hinterdorfer, P., Schilcher, K., Grunert, I., Dumfahrt, H. & Krautgartner, W.D (2008). Correlations between AFM and SEM imaging of acid-etched tooth enamel. Ultrastruct Pathol 32, 1–4.Google Scholar
Wright, J.T., Chen, S.C., Hall, K.I., Yamauchi, M. & Bawden, J.W. (1996). Protein characterization of fluorosed human enamel. J Dent Res 75, 1936–1941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed