Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:53:26.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automated Podosome Identification and Characterization in Fluorescence Microscopy Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2013

Marjolein B.M. Meddens ,
Bernd Rieger ,
Carl G. Figdor ,
Alessandra Cambi  and
Koen van den Dries
Marjolein B.M. Meddens
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Immunology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Bernd Rieger
Affiliation:
Quantitative Imaging Group, Department of Imaging Science & Technology, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands
Carl G. Figdor
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Immunology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Alessandra Cambi*
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Immunology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands Nanobiophysics, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine and MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Koen van den Dries
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Immunology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Podosomes are cellular adhesion structures involved in matrix degradation and invasion that comprise an actin core and a ring of cytoskeletal adaptor proteins. They are most often identified by staining with phalloidin, which binds F-actin and therefore visualizes the core. However, not only podosomes, but also many other cytoskeletal structures contain actin, which makes podosome segmentation by automated image processing difficult. Here, we have developed a quantitative image analysis algorithm that is optimized to identify podosome cores within a typical sample stained with phalloidin. By sequential local and global thresholding, our analysis identifies up to 76% of podosome cores excluding other F-actin-based structures. Based on the overlap in podosome identifications and quantification of podosome numbers, our algorithm performs equally well compared to three experts. Using our algorithm we show effects of actin polymerization and myosin II inhibition on the actin intensity in both podosome core and associated actin network. Furthermore, by expanding the core segmentations, we reveal a previously unappreciated differential distribution of cytoskeletal adaptor proteins within the podosome ring. These applications illustrate that our algorithm is a valuable tool for rapid and accurate large-scale analysis of podosomes to increase our understanding of these characteristic adhesion structures.

Keywords

podosomesimage analysisfluorescence microscopyactinimage quantificationcytoskeletal adaptor proteins
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 180 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, M.R., Badowski, C., Millon-Fremillon, A., Bouvard, D., Bouin, A.P., Faurobert, E., Gerber-Scokaert, D., Planus, E. & Albiges-Rizo, C. (2008). Podosome-type adhesions and focal adhesions, so alike yet so different. Eur J Cell Biol 87(8-9), 491–506.Google Scholar
Blouw, B., Seals, D.F., Pass, I., Diaz, B. & Courtneidge, S.A. (2008). A role for the podosome/invadopodia scaffold protein Tks5 in tumor growth in vivo. Eur J Cell Biol 87(8-9), 555–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Destaing, O., Saltel, F., Geminard, J.C., Jurdic, P. & Bard, F. (2003). Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actin-green fluorescent protein. Mol Biol Cell 14(2), 407–416.Google Scholar
de Vries, I.J., Eggert, A.A., Scharenborg, N.M., Vissers, J.L., Lesterhuis, W.J., Boerman, O.C., Punt, C.J., Adema, G.J. & Figdor, C.G. (2002). Phenotypical and functional characterization of clinical grade dendritic cells. J Immunother 25(5), 429–438.Google Scholar
Evans, J.G., Correia, I., Krasavina, O., Watson, N. & Matsudaira, P. (2003). Macrophage podosomes assemble at the leading lamella by growth and fragmentation. J Cell Biol 161(4), 697–705.Google Scholar
Feret, L.R. (1931). La grosseur des grains. Zurich: Assoc. Intern. Essais Math. 2D. Google Scholar
Gawden-Bone, C., Zhou, Z., King, E., Prescott, A., Watts, C. & Lucocq, J. (2010). Dendritic cell podosomes are protrusive and invade the extracellular matrix using metalloproteinase MMP-14. J Cell Sci 123(Pt 9), 1427–1437.Google Scholar
Jaqaman, K., Loerke, D., Mettlen, M., Kuwata, H., Grinstein, S., Schmid, S.L. & Danuser, G. (2008). Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat Methods 5(8), 695–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, S., Zhou, X.B., Kirchhausen, T. & Wong, S.T.C. (2007). Detection of molecular particles in live cells via machine learning. Cytometry Part A 71A(8), 563–575.Google Scholar
Kalaidzidis, Y. (2007). Intracellular objects tracking. Eur J Cell Biol 86(9), 569–578.Google Scholar
Kimori, Y., Baba, N. & Morone, N. (2010). Extended morphological processing: A practical method for automatic spot detection of biological markers from microscopic images. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 373.Google Scholar
Linder, S. (2007). The matrix corroded: Podosomes and invadopodia in extracellular matrix degradation. Trends Cell Biol 17(3), 107–117.Google Scholar
Luxenburg, C., Geblinger, D., Klein, E., Anderson, K., Hanein, D., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. (2007). The architecture of the adhesive apparatus of cultured osteoclasts: From podosome formation to sealing zone assembly. PLoS One 2(1), e179. Google Scholar
Luxenburg, C., Winograd-Katz, S., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. (2012). Involvement of actin polymerization in podosome dynamics. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 7), 1666–1672.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, U.K., Eves, R., Jia, L., Mooney, P. & Mak, A.S. (2009). p53 suppresses Src-induced podosome and rosette formation and cellular invasiveness through the upregulation of caldesmon. Mol Cell Biol 29(11), 3088–3098.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.A. & Courtneidge, S.A. (2011). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of podosomes and invadopodia: Characteristics, formation and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12(7), 413–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niblack, W. (1986). An Introduction to Digital Image Processing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Olivo-Marin, J.C. (2002). Extraction of spots in biological images using multiscale products. Pattern Recogn 35(9), 1989–1996.Google Scholar
Ridler, T.W. & Calvard, S. (1978). Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(8), 630–632.Google Scholar
Smal, I., Loog, M., Niessen, W. & Meijering, E. (2010). Quantitative comparison of spot detection methods in fluorescence microscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(2), 282–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurner, B., Roder, C., Dieckmann, D., Heuer, M., Kruse, M., Glaser, A., Keikavoussi, P., Kampgen, E., Bender, A. & Schuler, G. (1999). Generation of large numbers of fully mature and stable dendritic cells from leukapheresis products for clinical application. J Immunol Methods 223(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
van den Dries, K., van Helden, S.F., Riet, J., Diez-Ahedo, R., Manzo, C., Oud, M.M., van Leeuwen, F.N., Brock, R., Garcia-Parajo, M.F., Cambi, A. & Figdor, C.G. (2012). Geometry sensing by dendritic cells dictates spatial organization and PGE(2)-induced dissolution of podosomes. Cell Mol Life Sci 69(11), 1889–1901.Google Scholar
van Helden, S.F., Krooshoop, D.J., Broers, K.C., Raymakers, R.A., Figdor, C.G. & van Leeuwen, F.N. (2006). A critical role for prostaglandin E2 in podosome dissolution and induction of high-speed migration during dendritic cell maturation. J Immunol 177(3), 1567–1574.Google Scholar
van Helden, S.F., Oud, M.M., Joosten, B., Peterse, N., Figdor, C.G. & van Leeuwen, F.N. (2008). PGE2-mediated podosome loss in dendritic cells is dependent on actomyosin contraction downstream of the RhoA-Rho-kinase axis. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 7), 1096–1106.Google Scholar
Vincent, L. & Soille, P. (1991). Watersheds in digital spaces—An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(6), 583–598.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marjolein B.M. Meddens Supplementary Material

Supplementary data

Download Marjolein B.M. Meddens Supplementary Material(File)
File 85.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Marjolein B.M. Meddens Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Marjolein B.M. Meddens Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 205.5 KB