No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Authors' Response
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2004
Extract
The main purpose of the article by A.C. Diebold and coworkers (2003) is to propose a robust method for determination of gate oxide thickness. O'Keefe objects to a statement in this paper that “Lattice images do NOT depict the projected atom columns; instead, they are interference patterns of the directly transmitted beam with diffracted beams.”
- Type
- Letter to the Editor
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2004 Microscopy Society of America
References
REFERENCES
Coene, W.M.J.,
Thust, A.,
Op De Beeck, M., &
Van Dyck, D.
(1996).
Maximum likelihood method for focus-variation image reconstruction
in high resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Ultramicroscopy
64,
109–135.Google Scholar
Diebold, A.C.,
Foran, B.,
Kisielowski, C.,
Muller, D.A.,
Pennycook, S.J.,
Principe, E.,
Stemmer, S.
(2003).
Thin dielectric film thickness determination by advanced
transmission electron microscopy.
Microsc Microanal
9,
493–508.Google Scholar
Kirkland, E.J.
(1998).
Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy.
New York:
Plenum Press.
Kisielowski, C.,
Nelson, E.C.,
Song, C.,
Kilaas, R., &
Thust, A.
(2000).
Aberration corrected lattice imaging with sub-Angstrom resolution.
Microsc Microanal
6(Suppl. 2),
16–17.Google Scholar
Lichte, H.
(1991).
Optimum focus for taking electron holograms.
Ultramicroscopy
38,
13.Google Scholar