Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:28:37.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applications of Confocal Microscopy to Study the Roles of the Cytoskeleton During Early Embryogenesis In Amphibians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M. V. Danilchik
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201-3097
E. E. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201-3097
K. Larkin
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201-3097
K. Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR97201-3097
Get access

Extract

Because of their great size, availability, and capacity to develop autonomously in culture, amphibian eggs have become a productive system for a wide variety of experimental studies of animal cells. Their use has advanced our understanding of fundamental molecular and cellular processes such as transcription and translation, regulation of the cell cycle, and the function of the cytoskeleton. The amphibian egg, particularly that of the frog Xenopus laevis,has further served as an excellent system for studying complex developmental phenomena, including the roles of growth factors, signal transduction, and transcription regulation in cell determination, morphogenesis, and tissue differentiation.

Despite these advantages, the frog egg's great size and opacity have made it a challenging subject for microscopy. Thus, many problems in early development, such as how maternal cytoplasmic determinants become localized during cell division, have resisted traditional optical approaches.

Type
Applications of Imaging Techniques to the Study of Embryological Development
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Danilchik, M. V. et al, Devel. Biol. 194 (1998) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bluemink, J. G. and de Laat, S. W.J. Cell Biol. 59 (1973) 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sawai, T.. Dev.Growth Differ. 34 (1992) 669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. This research was supported by NSF IBN-9728908 and NASA NAG2-1199.Google Scholar