Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:05:29.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Boron in 9–12% Chromium Steels Using Atom Probe Tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2019

Irina Fedorova ,
Flemming Bjerg Grumsen ,
John Hald ,
Hans-Olof Andrén  and
Fang Liu
Irina Fedorova
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Flemming Bjerg Grumsen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
John Hald
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Hans-Olof Andrén
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Fang Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial and Materials Science, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
*
*Author for correspondence: Fang Liu, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Small additions of boron can remarkably improve the long-term creep resistance of 9–12% Cr steels. The improvement has been attributed to boron segregation to grain boundaries during quenching, and subsequent boron incorporation into certain families of precipitates during tempering. However, the detailed mechanisms are not yet fully understood. Atom probe tomography (APT) is an excellent technique for gaining insights into boron distribution, however, in order to acquire accurate analysis of boron in 9–12% Cr steels using APT, there are several key challenges. In order to better understand and address these challenges, we developed a novel method for site-specific APT specimen preparation, which enables convenient preparation of specimens containing specifically selected grain boundaries positioned approximately perpendicular to the axis of the APT tip. Additionally, when analyzing boron at boundaries and in carbides (as diluted solute) and borides, a widening of the profile of boron distribution compared to other elements was repeatedly observed. This phenomenon is particularly analyzed and discussed in light of the evaporation field of different elements. Finally, the possible effects of detector dead-time on quantitative analysis of boron in metal borides are discussed. A simple method using 10B correction was used to obtain good quantification.

Keywords

boridescarbidescustom-made specimen holderequilibrium segregationnon-equilibrium segregationprecipitatesprior austenite grain boundariesquantificationTKD
Type
Materials Science: Metals
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 25 , Special Issue 2: Atom Probe Tomography and Microscopy APT&M 2018 , April 2019 , pp. 462 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, F, Tabuchi, M, Tsukamoto, S & Shirane, T (2010). Microstructure evolution in HAZ and suppression of Type IV fracture in advanced ferritic power plant steels. Int J Press Vessel Pip 87, 598–604.Google Scholar
Angseryd, J, Liu, F & Andrén, H-O (2015). Nanostructure of a cubic BN cutting tool material. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 49, 283–287.Google Scholar
Babinsky, K, Knabl, W, Lorich, A, De Kloe, R, Clemens, H & Primig, S (2015). Grain boundary study of technically pure molybdenum by combining APT and TKD. Ultramicroscopy 159, 445–451.Google Scholar
Breen, AJ, Babinsky, K, Day, AC, Eder, K, Oakman, CJ, Trimby, PW, Primig, S, Cairney, JM & Ringer, SP (2017). Correlating atom probe crystallographic measurements with transmission Kikuchi diffraction data. Microsc Microanal 23, 279–290.Google Scholar
Böhlke, JK, de Laeter, JR, De Bièvre, P, Hidaka, H, Peiser, HS, Rosman, KJR & Taylor, PDP (2005). Isotopic compositions of the elements. J Phys Chem Ref Data 34, 57–67.Google Scholar
Da Costa, G, Vurpillot, F, Bostel, A, Bouet, M & Deconihout, B (2005). Design of a delay-line position-sensitive detector with improved performance. Rev Sci Instrum 76, 013304.Google Scholar
Da Costa, G, Wang, H, Duguay, S, Bostel, A, Blavette, D & Deconihout, B (2012). Advance in multi-hit detection and quantization in atom probe tomography. Rev Sci Instrum 83, 123709.Google Scholar
Fedorova, I, Grumsen, FB, Liu, F & Hald, J (2017). On the non-equilibrium segregation of Boron in 9–12% Cr steels. In 4th International ECCC Creep & Fracture Conference, Düsseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
Fedorova, I, Liu, F, Grumsen, FB, Cao, Y, Mishin, OV & Hald, J (2018). Fine (Cr,Fe)2B borides on grain boundaries in a 10Cr-0.01B martensitic steel. Scr Mater 156, 124–128.Google Scholar
Felfer, PJ, Gault, B, Sha, G, Stephenson, L, Ringer, S & Cairney, JM (2012). A new approach to the determination of concentration profiles in atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal 18, 359–364.Google Scholar
Felfer, P, Ringer, SP & Cairney, JM (2011). Shaping the lens of the atom probe: Fabrication of site specific, oriented specimens and application to grain boundary analysis. Ultramicroscopy 11, 435–439.Google Scholar
Golpayegani, A, Liu, F, Svensson, H, Andersson, M & Andrén, H-O (2011). Microstructure of a creep resistant 10% chromium steel containing 250 ppm boron. Metall Mater Trans A 42, 940–951.Google Scholar
Hald, J (2008). Microstructure and long-term creep properties of 9–12% Cr steels. Int J Press Vessel Pip 85, 30–37.Google Scholar
Karlsson, L & Norden, H (1988). Non-equilibrium grain boundary segregation of boron in austenitic stainless steel—IV. Precipitation behaviour and distribution of elements at grain boundaries. Acta Metall 36, 35–48.Google Scholar
Li, YJ, Ponge, D, Choi, P & Raabe, D (2015). Segregation of boron at prior austenite grain boundaries in a quenched martensitic steel studied by atom probe tomography. Scr Mater 96, 13–16.Google Scholar
Liu, F & Andrén, H-O (2011). Effects of laser pulsing on analysis of steels by atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 111, 633–641.Google Scholar
Liu, F, Fors, DHR, Golpayegani, A, Andrén, H-O & Wahnström, G (2012). Effect of boron on carbide coarsening at 873 K (600 °C) in 9 to 12 pct chromium steels. Metall Mater Trans A 43, 4053–4062.Google Scholar
Miller, MK (2000). Atom Probe Tomography—Analysis at the Atomic Level. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, MK, Cerezo, A, Hetherington, MG & Smith, GDW (1996). Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, MK & Jayaram, R (1992). Some factors affecting analysis in the atom probe. Surf Sci 266, 458–462.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, G, Goto, A, Takayama, N & Furuhara, T (2018). Three-dimensional atom probe analysis of boron segregation at austenite grain boundary in a low carbon steel—effects of boundary misorientation and quenching temperature. Scr Mater 154, 168–171.Google Scholar
Oberdorfer, C, Eich, SM & Schmitz, G (2013). A full-scale simulation approach for atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 128, 55–67.Google Scholar
Rashidi, M, Andrén, H-O & Liu, F (2017). Core-shell structure of intermediate precipitates in a Nb-based Z-phase strengthened 12% Cr steel. Microsc Microanal 23, 360–365.Google Scholar
Rashidi, M, Odqvist, J, Johansson, L, Hald, J, Andrén, H-O & Liu, F (2018). Experimental and theoretical investigation of precipitate coarsening rate in Z-phase strengthened steels. Materialia 4, 247–254.Google Scholar
Rice, KP, Chen, YM, Prosa, TJ & Larson, DJ (2016). Implementing transmission electron backscatter diffraction for atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal 22, 583–588.Google Scholar
Shigesato, G, Fufishiro, T & Hara, T (2014). Grain boundary segregation behaviour of boron in low-alloy steel. Metall Mater Trans A 45, 1876–1882.Google Scholar
Thuvander, M, Weidow, J, Angseryd, J, Falk, LKL, Liu, F, Sonestedt, M, Stiller, K & Andrén, H-O (2011). Quantitative atom probe analysis of carbides. Ultramicroscopy 111, 604–608.Google Scholar
Tsuji, N, Matsubara, Y, Sakai, T & Saito, Y (1997). Effect of boron addition on the microstructure of hot-deformed Ti-added interstitial free steel. ISIJ Int 37, 797–806.Google Scholar
Vurpillot, F, Bostel, A & Blavette, D (2000). Trajectory overlaps and local magnification in three-dimensional atom probe. Appl Phys Lett 76, 3127–3129.Google Scholar
Westbrook, JH (1964). Segregation at grain boundaries. Metall Rev 9, 415–471.Google Scholar
Williams, TM, Stoneham, AM & Harries, DR (1976). The segregation of boron to grain boundaries in solution-treated Type 316 austenitic stainless steel. Met Sci 10, 14–19.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Y, Takahashi, J & Kawakami, K (2009). The study of quantitativeness in atom probe analysis of alloying elements in steel. Ultramicroscopy 109, 541–544.Google Scholar