Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:17:40.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrahigh-Vacuum Third-Order Spherical Aberration (Cs) Corrector for a Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2006

Kazutaka Mitsuishi ,
Masaki Takeguchi ,
Yukihito Kondo ,
Fumio Hosokawa ,
Kimiharu Okamoto ,
Takumi Sannomiya ,
Madoka Hori ,
Takeshi Iwama ,
Muneyuki Kawazoe  and
Kazuo Furuya
Kazutaka Mitsuishi
Affiliation:
High-Voltage Electron Microscopy Station, National Institute for Materials Science, 3-13 Sakura, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0003, Japan
Masaki Takeguchi
Affiliation:
High-Voltage Electron Microscopy Station, National Institute for Materials Science, 3-13 Sakura, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0003, Japan
Yukihito Kondo
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Fumio Hosokawa
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Kimiharu Okamoto
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Takumi Sannomiya
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Madoka Hori
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Takeshi Iwama
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Muneyuki Kawazoe
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd., 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196-8558, Japan
Kazuo Furuya
Affiliation:
High-Voltage Electron Microscopy Station, National Institute for Materials Science, 3-13 Sakura, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0003, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Initial results from an ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) third-order spherical aberration (Cs) corrector for a dedicated scanning transmission electron microscopy, installed at the National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Japan, are presented here. The Cs corrector is of the dual hexapole type. It is UHV compatible and was installed on a UHV column. The Ronchigram obtained showed an extension of the sweet spot area, indicating a successful correction of the third-order spherical aberration Cs. The power spectrum of an image demonstrated that the resolution achieved was 0.1 nm. A first trial of the direct measurement of the fifth-order spherical aberration C5 was also attempted on the basis of a Ronchigram fringe measurement.

Keywords

aberration correctorscanning transmission electron microscopyRonchigram
Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 12 , Issue 6: Special Issue: Frontiers of Electron Microscopy in Materials Science , December 2006 , pp. 456 - 460
Copyright
© 2006 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batson, P.E. (2003). Aberration correction results in the IBM STEM instrument. Ultramicroscopy 96, 239–249.Google Scholar
Batson, P.E., Dellby, N., & Krivanek, O.L. (2002). Sub-Ångstrom resolution using aberration corrected electron optics. Nature 418, 617–620.Google Scholar
Dellby, N., Krivanek, O.L., Nellist, P.D., Batson, P.E., & Lupini, A.R. (2001). Progress in aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc 50, 177–185.Google Scholar
Falke, U., Bleloch, A.L., Falke, M., & Kolodzie, A. (2003). UK SuperSTEM: Capabilities, prospects and first results. Microsc Semicond Mater 180, 533–536.Google Scholar
Haider, M., Uhlemann, S., Schwan, E., Rose, H., Kabius, B., & Urban, K. (1998). Electron microscopy image enhanced. Nature 392, 768–769.Google Scholar
Haider, M., Uhlemann, S., & Zach, J. (2000). Upper limits for the residual aberrations of a high-resolution aberration-corrected STEM. Ultramicroscopy 81, 163–175.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J.L., Titchmarsh, J.M., Cockayne, D.J.H., Doole, R.C., Hetherington, C.J.D., Kirkland, A.I., & Sawada, H. (2005). Versatile double aberration-corrected, energy filtered HREM/STEM for materials science. Ultramicroscopy 103, 7–15.Google Scholar
Ito, Y., Bleloch, A.L., & Brown, L.M. (1998). Nanofabrication of solid-state Fresnel lenses for electron optics. Nature 394, 49–52.Google Scholar
Krivanek, O.L., Nellist, P.D., Dellby, N., Murfitt, M.F., & Szilagyi, M.Z. (2003). Towards sub-0.5 Å electron beams. Ultramicroscopy 96, 229–237.Google Scholar
Lin, J.A. & Cowley, J.M. (1986). Calibration of the operating parameters for an HB5 STEM instrument. Ultramicroscopy 19, 31–42.Google Scholar
Mitsuishi, K., Shimojo, M., Han, M., & Furuya, K. (2003). Electron-beam-induced deposition using a subnanometer-sized probe of high-energy electrons. Appl Phys Lett 83, 2064–2066.Google Scholar
Nellist, P.D., Chisholm, M.F., Dellby, N., Krivanek, O.L., Murfitt, M.F., Szilagyi, Z.S., Lupini, A.R., Borisevich, A., Sides, W.H., & Pennycook, S.J. (2004). Direct sub-angstrom imaging of a crystal lattice. Science 305, 1741.Google Scholar
Poppa, H. (2004). High resolution, high speed ultrahigh vacuum microscopy. J Vac Sci Technol A 22, 1931–1947.Google Scholar
Rose, H. (1990). Outline of a spherically corrected semiaplanatic medium-voltage transmission electron microscope. Optik 85, 19–24.Google Scholar
Sawada, H., Tomita, T., Naruse, M., Honda, T., Hambridge, P., Hartel, P., Haider, M., Hetherington, C., Doole, R., Kirkland, A., Hutchison, J., Titchmarch, J., & Cockayne, D. (2005). Experimental evaluation of a spherical aberration-corrected TEM and STEM. J Elect Microsc 54, 119–121.Google Scholar
Silvis-Cividjian, N., Hagen, C.W., Kruit, P., van der Stam, M.A.J., & Groen, H.B. (2003). Direct fabrication of nanowires in an electron microscope. Appl Phys Lett 82, 3514–3516.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., Furuya, K., Takeguchi, M., & Honda, T. (1998). Surface observation of Mo nanocrystals deposited on Si 111 thin films by a newly developed ultrahigh vacuum field-emission transmission electron microscope. Thin Solid Films 319, 110–114.Google Scholar
Uhlemann, S. & Haider, M. (1998). Residual wave aberrations in the first spherical aberration corrected transmission electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy 72, 109–119.Google Scholar
van Benthem, K., Lupini, A.R., Kim, M., Baik, H.S., Doh, S., Lee, J.H., Oxley, M.P., Findlay, S.D., Allen, L.J., Luck, J.T., & Pennycook, S.J. (2005). Three-dimensional imaging of individual hafnium atoms inside a semiconductor device. Appl Phys Lett 87, (034104) 1–3.Google Scholar
van der Stam, M., Stekelenburg, M., Freitag, B., Hubert, D., & Ringnalda, J. (2005). A new aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy for a new era. Microsc Anal 19, 13–15.Google Scholar
Varela, M., Findlay, S.D., Lupini, A.R., Christen, H.M., Borisevich, A.Y., Dellby, N., Krivanek, O.L., Nellist, P.D., Oxley, M.P., Allen, L.J., & Pennycook, S.J. (2004). Spectroscopic imaging of single atoms within a bulk solid. Phys Rev Lett 92, (095502) 1–4.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, T., Kotaka, Y., Kikuchi, Y., & Watanabe, K. (2005). Precise measurement of third-order spherical aberration using low-order zone-axis Ronchigrams. Ultramicroscopy 106, 153–163.Google Scholar
Yu, Z., Batson, P.E., & Silcox, J. (2003). Artifacts in aberration-corrected ADF-STEM imaging. Ultramicroscopy 96, 275–284.Google Scholar