Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:29:18.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical Assessment Of Experimental Uncertainty In The Quantitative Analysis Of Strong-Beam A-Fringe Contrast.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Dov Cohen  and
C. Barry Carter
Dov Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
C. Barry Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
Get access

Extract

Grain boundaries and related planar defects in crystalline materials are often characterized by relaxations from geometric lattice constructions in order to lower the interfacial energy. Grain boundaries may relax by local reconstructions of the atomic structure along the interface and/or rigid-body lattice translations that perturb the relative positions of the grains far from the interface. Rigid-body lattice translations can by studied using α-fringe contrast along planar interfaces in strong-beam transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images.[l-3] Oscillatory fringe contrast may appear along an interface between two grains which are related by a translation vector, R, when the interface lies inclined to the incident electron beam and imaged with a diffraction vector, gc, common to both grains.[4] The fringe contrast is due to an interference between the direct and scattered electron beams when the diffracted electron beams undergo a phase shift propagating across the interface. The phase shift, α, is proportional to the projection of R onto gc (i.e. α = Rgc) and the fringe contrast is known as α-fringe.

Type
Atomic Structure And Microchemistry Of Interfaces
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 5 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis '99, Microscopy Society of America 57th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 33rd Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon August 1-5, 1999 , August 1999 , pp. 172 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pond, R.C. and Vitek, V., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 1977. A 357: 453.Google Scholar
2.Pond, R.C. and Smith, D.A., Proc. 6th Eur. Cong. ofE. M. Jerusalem, 1976: 233.Google Scholar
3.Pond, R.C, A., S.D., and Clark, W.A.T., J. Microscopy, 1974. 102: 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hirsch, P.B., et al, Electron Microscopy of Thin Crystals. 1965, London: Buttersworths.Google Scholar
5.Vlachavas, D. and Pond, R.C, Inst. Phys. Conf. Sen, 1981. 60: 159.Google Scholar
6.Cohen, D., Medlin, D.L., and Carter, C.B., Microscopy and Microanalysis '98, 1998.4:786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Rasmussen, D.R., McKernan, S., and Carter, C.B., Phys. Rev. Lett, 1991. 66: 2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Press, W.H., et al, Numerical Recipes in Fortran. 1992, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
9.Stalling, J., J. Microscopy, 1997. 719/720: 100.Google Scholar
10.Smith, A.F.M. and G.O., Roberts, J. R. Statis. Soc. B, 1993. 55: 3.Google Scholar
11.Cohen, D., Bentley, J., and Carter, C.B. “EFTEM observations of a-fringe Contrast” (in preparation)Google Scholar