Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:01:14.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Robust Two-View Method for Increasing the Imaging Depth and Correcting for Signal Attenuation in Confocal Microscope Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Ali Can ,
Shade Lasek ,
Donald H. Szarowski ,
James N. Turner  and
Badrinath Roysam
Ali Can
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8, th Street, Troy, New York, 12180
Shade Lasek
Affiliation:
Wadsworth Center, NY State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12201
Donald H. Szarowski
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8, th Street, Troy, New York, 12180
James N. Turner
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8, th Street, Troy, New York, 12180 Wadsworth Center, NY State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12201
Badrinath Roysam
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110, 8, th Street, Troy, New York, 12180
Get access

Extract

Confocal Microscopy is now an essential, and widely used tool for biological research. Particularly valuable is its ability to image thick sections of intact tissue. A compelling need in this field is to improve the imaging depth, as well as quantitative accuracy, and minimize the possibility of missing important structures/phenomena due to attenuation of the imaging signal. Previous methods work by amplifying the signal from deeper parts of the specimen. In these methods, amplification of noise is an unavoidable artifact. We describe a novel method that not only corrects confocal stacks for attenuation without noise amplification, but also enhances the achievable imaging depth. Interestingly, it does not require explicit estimation of the extinction factor, It relies on a synergistic combination of specimen preparation and image reconstruction algorithms.

The key idea is to image the specimen from two angles (Fig. 1), separated by 180° and then to reconstruct the complete thick image using computational methods.

Type
Confocal Microscopy
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 6 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2000, Microscopy Society of America 58th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 34th Annual Meeting, Microscopical Society of Canada/Societe de Microscopie de Canada 27th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 13-17, 2000 , August 2000 , pp. 818 - 819
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

[1]Kayali, et al., Proc. Ann MSA Meeting, 54(1996)462–463.Google Scholar
[2]Nagelhus, T.A., et al., Cytometry,23 (3)(1996)187–95.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Liljeborg, A et al., J Microsc, 177 ( Pt 2) (1995)108–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Masters, BR; Farmer, M, Comput Med Imaging Graph, 17 (3)(1993)211-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Rigaut, JP; Vassy, , J,Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 13 (4)(1991)223-32.Google Scholar
[6]Xiang, J. et al., Chinese Journal of Lasers, A25:9(1998)841-6.Google Scholar
[7]Margadant, F., et al., J. Microsc., 182:2(1996)121-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]van der Voort, H.T.M. and Strasters, K.C., ,J. Microsc, 178:2(1995)165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Strasters, K.C., et al., Bioimaging, 2:2(1994)78–92.3.3.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Roerdink, J.B.T.M., Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 4:2(1994)199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Visser, T.D. etal., J. Microsc, 163:2(1991)189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar