Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:42:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Elemental Analysis of Heavy Metal Exposed Cells of Synechococcus Leopoliensis Using Regular and Overplus Cells: An Energy Disspersive X-Ray Spectroscopy Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J.J. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Lehman College and CUNY Grad. Center, Bronx, NY10468
T.E. Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Lehman College and CUNY Grad. Center, Bronx, NY10468
Get access

Extract

It has previously been shown that microbial polyphosphate bodies are the main sites of metal sequestration. In our present study, we have exposed Synechococcus leopoliensis, grown to log phase and to overplus phase, to five different heavy metals, Al, Cu, Cd, Pb, and Zn, independently. The cells were analyzed using the STEM mode of a transmission electron microscope in conjunction with a PGT IMIX energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer.

Cells of Synechococcus leopoliensis were grown for two weeks at 21°C on a 12-hour light/dark cycle in modified Fizgerald’s medium The second cell type were the overplus cells, which were grown as previously described. The cells were exposed to 100PPM of each metal for two hours, then were fixed and embedded in EPON according to Luff’s procedure.

For x-ray analysis, cells of interest were first located using the TEM mode. The microscope was then switched to the STEM mode.

Type
Mas Celebrates: Fifty Years of Electron Probe Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jensen, T.E.et.alEnviron Pollut. Ser A27(1982)Google Scholar
2.Baxter, M. and Jensen, T.E., Cytobios 45(1986) 147Google Scholar
3.Luft, J.H., J Biophys Biochem Cytol 9(1961)409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hall, T.A., J Microscopie Biol. Cell 22(1975)271Google Scholar
5.Heldal, M., Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
6.Pankratz, H.S.and Bowen, C.C., Am J Bot 50(1963)387CrossRefGoogle Scholar