Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:21:24.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology of Poly Amide Nanocomposites Characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Electron Spectroscopic Imaging (ESI).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

W. Heckmann
Affiliation:
BASF AG, Polymers Laboratory, D-67056, Ludwigshafen, Germany
F. Ramsteiner
Affiliation:
BASF AG, Polymers Laboratory, D-67056, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Ch. Mehler
Affiliation:
BASF AG, Polymers Laboratory, D-67056, Ludwigshafen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The introduction of organophilic layered silicates into a polyamide matrix significantly improves stiffness and strength [1,2]. Two methods are known to prepare such nanocomposites. For both methods cations such as sodium, potassium, magnesium or calcium, located in the interlayer galleries of the layered silicates must be exchanged by quaternary alkyl ammonium ions containing at least one alkyl chain and so rendering the originally hydrophilic into an organophilic silicate. in the insitu-method monomeric caprolactam is intercalated between the modified silicate interlayers and subsequently polycondensated to polyamide. By this method the silicates can be broken down into their nanoscale building blocks as can be shown by TEM and ESI (Fig. 1). Another more direct possibility to delaminate the silicates is melt mixing in an extruder. with both methods similar degrees of delamination can be achieved.

This paper presents some of our morphological results on polyamide containing organically modified montmorillonite.

Type
Microscopy in the Real World: Semiconductors and Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kojima, Y. et. al, J. Polym. Sci. Part A, 31 (1993) 983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kojima, Y. et. al, J. Mater. Res. 8 (1993) 1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Spit, B. I., Faserforschung und Textiltechnik, 18 (1967) 161Google Scholar