Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:56:58.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microscopic Evidence Of Biofilm Formation In The Gut Of Two Pest Tephritidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S.E. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Hayward, Hayward, CA94542
C.R. Lauzon
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Hayward, Hayward, CA94542
N.R. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Hayward, Hayward, CA94542
Get access

Extract

Tephritidae are the true fruit flies, which include the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), the walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa Cresson, the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrephaludens (Loew), and the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Fruit fly infestation causes major damage to many economically-important food crops and is of major concern in agriculture worldwide.

Tephritidae are controlled primarily by repeated applications of organophosphate pesticides. Health concerns, environmental pollution, and costs associated with pesticide use press researchers to find new methods for control. One approach to finding new control methods involves investigating the associations that exist between tephritids and microorganisms. Currently, bacterial odors are being used to lure these pest tephritids into traps. These flies are specifically attracted to odors from certain bacteria found to inhabit their gut. Data suggest that these bacteria are likely involved in important aspects of fruit fly nutrition and reproduction.

Type
Cytochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lauzon, C.R. et al., Env. Entomol. 27(4) (1998) 853857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lauzon, C.R. et al., J. Chem. Ecol. 1999 (in press).Google Scholar
3.This research was supported in part by internal funds provided by California State University, Hayward, and the Microscope and Graphic Imaging Center at California State University, Hayward.Google Scholar