Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:08:06.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Low-Dose Electron Diffraction Assay for Protection of Protein Structure against Damage from Drying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2004

William H. Massover
William H. Massover
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07101-1709, USA
Get access

Abstract

A new assay using low-dose electron diffraction to measure the protection of protein structure against damage from drying is described. When thin single crystals of catalase are dried within water alone, low-dose electron diffraction yields no Bragg spots. Drying within an experimental aqueous solution that permits detection of diffraction spots thereby indicates a positive result, and the extent of these Bragg reflections into the high angle range gives a quantitative measure of the degree of protection. Bragg spots out to 3.7–3.9 Å are recorded for drying within 100 mM solutions of the known structure-preserving sugars, sucrose, tannin, and trehalose. The ability of trehalose to maintain native protein structure during drying starts between 10 and 25 mM, and changes only slightly at concentrations above this threshold; with drying in 150-mM trehalose, catalase crystals yield diffraction spots out to 3.7 Å. Drying within the organic nonsugar polymer polyvinylpyrrolidone gives Bragg spots to 4.0 Å. This new assay should be useful to measure the unexamined structure-preserving capabilities of modified sugars, other nonsugars, and mixtures to identify which protective matrix maintains native protein structure to the greatest extent during drying; electron crystallography using that optimal matrix should yield protein structure at improved levels of high resolution.

Keywords

catalaseelectron crystallographyelectron diffractionpolyvinylpyrrolidoneprotein structureresolutionsugar sustains
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 261 - 269
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brink, J., Chiu, W., & Dougherty, M. (1992). Computer-controlled spot-scan imaging of crotoxin complex crystals with 400 kV electrons at near-atomic resolution. Ultramicrosc 46, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, J.H., Carpenter, J.F., & Crowe, L.M. (1998). The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Ann Rev Physiol l60, 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowe, L.M. (2002). Lessons from nature: The role of sugars in anhydrobiosis. Comp Biochem Physiol 131A, 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darbyshire, B. (1974). The influence of dehydration on catalase stability. A comparison with freezing effects. Cryobiol 11, 148–151.Google Scholar
De Carlo, S., Adrian, M., Kälin, P., Mayer, J.M., & Dubochet, J. (1999). Unexpected property of trehalose as observed by cryo-electron microscopy. J Microsc (Oxf) 196, 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, K.H. & Li, H. (2001). Accurate recording and measurement of electron diffraction data in structural and difference Fourier studies of proteins. Microsc Microanal 7, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubochet, J., Groom, M., & Mueller-Neuteboom, S. (1982). The mounting of macromolecules for electron microscopy with particular reference to surface phenomena and the treatment of support films by glow discharge. Adv Optic Electron Microsc 8, 107–135.Google Scholar
Ellis, M.J. & Hebert, H. (2001). Structure analysis of soluble proteins using electron crystallography. Micron 32, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J. (2002). Single-particle imaging of macromolecules by cryo-electron microscopy. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 31, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, R.M. (1999). Review: Electron crystallography: Present excitement, a nod to the past, anticipating the future. J Struct Biol 128, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, J.M., Fuller, S.D., & Stuart, D.I. (1999) Complementing crystallography: The role of cryo-electron microscopy in structural biology. Acta Crystallogr D 55, 1742–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.R., Gerber, M., Gebauer, W., Wernicke, W., & Markl, J. (1996). Negative stains containing trehalose: Application to tubular and filamentous structures. J Microsc Soc Am 2, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J.R. & Scheffler, D. (2002). Routine preparation of air-dried negatively stained and unstained specimens on holey carbon support films: A review of applications. Micron 33, 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirai, T., Murata, K., Mitsuoka, K., Kimura, Y., & Fujiyoshi, Y. (1999). Trehalose embedding technique for high-resolution electron crystallography: Application to structural study of bacteriorhodopsin. J Electron Microsc 48, 653–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jap, B.K., Downing, K.H., & Walian, P.J. (1990). Structure of PhoE porin in projection at 3.5Å resolution. J Struct Biol 103, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, T.-P., Day, J., Malkin, A.J., & McPherson, A. (1999). Structure of orthorhombic crystals of beef liver catalase. Acta Crystallogr D55, 1383–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühlbrandt, W. (1987). Three-dimensional crystals of the light harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein complex from pea chloroplasts. J Mol Biol 194, 757–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühlbrandt, W. & Williams, K.A. (1999). Analysis of macromolecular structure and dynamics by electron cryo-microscopy. Curr Opin Chem Biol 3, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longley, W. (1967). The crystal structure of bovine liver catalase: A combined study by x-ray diffraction and electron microscopy. J Mol Biol 30, 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massover, W.H. (1994). Potassium phosphate: An unconventional negative stain. In Electron Microscopy 1994, Jouffrey, B. & Colliex, C. (Eds.), pp. 569–570. Les Ulis, France: Les Editions du Physique.
Massover, W.H., Lai, P.F., & Marsh, P. (2001). Negative staining permits 4.0 Å resolution with low-dose electron diffraction of catalase crystals. Ultramicrosc 90, 7–12.Google Scholar
Massover, W.H. & Marsh, P. (1997). Heavy metals are not required for negative staining. Ultramicrosc 69, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massover, W.H. & Marsh, P. (2000). Light atom derivatives of structures-preserving sugars are unconventional negative stains. Ultramicrosc 85, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matricardi, V.R., Moretz, R.C., & Parsons, D.F. (1972). Electron diffraction of wet proteins: Catalase. Science 177, 268–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, B.W. (1968). Solvent content of protein crystals. J Mol Biol 33, 491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsuoka, K., Hirai, T., Murata, K., Miyazawa, A., Kidera, A., Kimura, Y., & Fujiyoshi, Y. (1999). The structure of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å resolution based on electron crystallography: Implication of the charge distribution. J Mol Biol 286, 861–882.Google Scholar
Nogales, E., Wolf, S.G., Zhang, S.X., & Downing, K.H. (1995). Preservation of 2-D crystals of tubulin for electron crystallography. J Struct Biol 115, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, A.E., Leprince, O., Wolkers, W.F., Hincha, D.K., Heyer, A.G., & Crowe, J.H. (2001). Non-disaccharide-based mechanisms of protection during drying. Cryobiol 43, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestrelski, S.J., Tedeschi, N., Arakawa, T., & Carpenter, J.F. (1993). Dehydration-induced conformational transitions in proteins and their inhibition by stabilizers. Biophys J 65, 661–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A.B., Krakowka, S., Dexter, L.B., Schmid, H., Waterbeek, A.P.M., Waalkensberendsen, D.H., Shigoyuki, A., & Kurimoto, M. (2002). Trehalose: A review of properties, history of use and human tolerance, and results of multiple safety studies. Food Chem Toxicol 40, 871–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saibil, H.R. (2000). Macromolecular structure determination by cryo-electron microscopy. Acta Crystallogr D 56, 1215–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, R.R., Hofmann, W., & Ménétret, J.-F. (1990). Zero-loss energy filtering as improved imaging mode in cryoelectronmicroscopy of frozen-hydrated specimens. J Struct Biol 105, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, H., Zemlin, F., & Boettcher, C. (1996). Electron radiation damage to protein crystals of bacteriorhodopsin at different temperatures. Ultramicrosc 63, 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, W.Q. & Davidson, P. (1998). Protein inactivation in amorphous sucrose and trehalose matrices: Effects of phase separation and crystallization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1425, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K., Takeda, T., & Miyajima, K. (1991). Cryoprotective effect of saccharides on denaturation of catalase by freeze-drying. Chem Pharmaceut Bull 39, 1091–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unwin, P.N.T. (1975). Beef liver catalase structure: Interpretation of electron micrographs. J Mol Biol 98, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unwin, P.N.T. & Henderson, R. (1975). Molecular structure determination by electron microscopy of unstained crystalline specimens. J Mol Biol 94, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uritani, M., Takai, M., & Yoshinaga, K. (1995). Protective effect of disaccharides on restriction endonucleases during drying under vacuum. J Biochem 117, 774–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, D.N. & Kühlbrandt, W. (1991). High-resolution electron crystallography of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-protein complex in three different media. J Mol Biol 217, 691–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, N.G. (1968). The lattice spacing of crystalline catalase as an internal standard of length in electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 24, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonekura, K., Maki-Yonekura, S., & Namba K. (2002). Quantitative comparison of zero-loss and conventional electron diffraction from two-dimensional and thin three-dimensional protein crystals. Biophys J 82, 2784–2797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar