Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:55:15.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local Electrode Atom Probes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Thomas F. Kelly
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA53706
Patrick P. Camus
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA53706
Get access

Extract

The Need for Improvements. Though atom probe techniques have impressive atomic-scale analytical capabilities, there are some definite needs for improvement. The needle shape of APFIM specimens is a difficult geometry to make for many types of materials, especially technologically important thin-film materials. Even though 3DAPs collect more data than traditional APs, the analysis volumes are still small by analytical standards: typically there are fewer than 1 million atoms in an image which is about 15nm x 15nm x 50nm. The data collection rate (up to tens of atoms per second) limits the practical size of analyzed volumes to about 1 million atoms. Poor mass resolution makes it difficult to separate ions of similar mass-to-charge ratio in spectra of approximately 20% of samples. Thus, there are three principal areas where improvements are desirable: 1) specimen geometry, 2) data collection rates, and 3) mass resolving power.

Type
Imaging and Analysis at the Atomic Level: 30 Years of Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Nishikawa, O. and Kimoto, M., Appl. Surf. Sci., 76/77 (1994) 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Larson, D. J., Teng, C.-M., Camus, P. P., and Kelly, T. F., Appl. Surf. Sci., 87/88 (1995) 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Larson, D. J., unpublished research, 1997.Google Scholar
4.Bajikar, S. S., Larson, D. J., Camus, P. P., and Kelly, T. F.Ultramicroscopy, 65 (1996) 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bajikar, S. S., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Chapters 7.8 and 7.9 (1996).Google Scholar
6.Bajikar, S. S., Kelly, T. F., and Camus, P. P., Appl. Surf. Sci., 94/95 (1995) 464.Google Scholar
7. This work is supported by grant number DMR-9703932 from the National Science Foundation.Google Scholar