Article contents
Iterative Structure Retrieval Techniques for Aperiodic Defects (e.g. Dislocations) using QHREM
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2020
Extract
The determination of unknown crystal defect structures by iterative digital image matching (“quantitative HREM”) has previously been successfully applied to grain boundaries (e.g. in niobium [1]) or phase boundaries with small misfit (e.g. Nb-sapphire [2]), which offer several advantages: (i) the supercell is small leading to fast cycle times in iterative structure refinement and thus to a secure global optimum, (ii) noise-filtering is possible by translation symmetry, (iii) the interface structure is mostly planar (i.e. perfectly columnar). For dislocations and other aperiodic defects all these three issues are missing and curved atomic columns from surface strains especially cause problems [3]. Any progress in this area must therefore address (i) - (iii) separately and estimate the change of the confidence level of the retrieved structure when switching from interface-refinement to dislocation-refinement. First results of this project address questions of convergency and speed.
Since each HREM-Lab is only concerned with a limited number of materials (and elements) as well as with a few microscope-voltages only, it is advisable to calculate transmission functions for single atoms for each element and voltage a single time, and store these data files in a library.
- Type
- Atomic Structure and Mechanisms at Interfaces in Materials
- Information
- Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 3 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis '97, Microscopy Society of America 55th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 31st Annual Meeting, Histochemical Society 48th Annual Meeting, Cleveland, Ohio, August 10-14, 1997 , August 1997 , pp. 679 - 680
- Copyright
- Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997
References
1. King, W. and Campbell, G., Ultramicroscopy, 56, 46 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Möbus, G. and Rühle, M., Ultramicroscopy, 56, 54 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Mills, M., Daw, M. and Foiles, S., Ultramicroscopy, 56, 79 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Möbus, G. and Dehm, G., Ultramicroscopy, 65, 205–216 and 217-228 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Möbus, G.et al. Journal of Microscopy, to be published, (1997)Google Scholar
6. Bernath, S., Thesis, University of Stuttgart (1997)Google Scholar
7. Phillipp, F., Höschen, R., Osaki, M., Möbus, G., and Rühle, M., Ultramicroscopy, 56, 1 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Möbus, G.et al., Journal of Electron Microscopy, to be published, (1997)Google Scholar
9. Stadelmann, P., Ultramicroscopy, 21, 131 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. >We acknowledge Inkson, B.J. for helpful discussionsWe+acknowledge+Inkson,+B.J.+for+helpful+discussions>Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by