Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:52:54.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insights into the Residue Trapped in Glaze Cracks of Archaeological Ceramics Using Microchemical Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Zihan Li Open the ORCID record for Zihan Li [Opens in a new window] ,
Feng Yuan ,
Jianwen Cao  and
Anke Hein Open the ORCID record for Anke Hein [Opens in a new window]
Zihan Li*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Feng Yuan
Affiliation:
Institute of Ancient Ceramic, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen, China
Jianwen Cao
Affiliation:
Art and Archaeology School, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen, China
Anke Hein
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Zihan Li, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Searching for residue in the glaze of porcelain or stoneware is a difficult task because these glazes are high-fired, well vitrified, and nonporous. This paper analyzes the chemical composition of residue observed in glaze cracks of porcelain via SEM-EDS to determine how the crackle effect was produced, in particular, if it was intentionally created during production or the result of post-depositional processes. This study offers insights to a specific type of ancient Chinese porcelain called “Ge-type ware”, which has two different types of cracks, and whose origin has been debated for nearly 60 years because it has never been found at any kiln site. This paper analyzes the chemical composition of the two crack types, first using elemental mapping to ascertain the different mechanisms that produced these two crack types of the Heirloom Ge ware, and second using residue analysis and chemical fingerprinting to determine the provenance of this puzzling type of porcelain. In doing so, this paper demonstrates how the residue in the glaze of porcelain can be observed and analyzed via microchemical approaches and hopes to inspire more research using this technique in future.

Keywords

Ge-type wareglaze cracksresidueSEM-EDS
Type
Materials Science Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 1878 - 1889
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, RL, Rands, RL & Holley, GR (1982). Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Schiffer, MB (Ed.), pp. 275–330. New York: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, E, Knowles, TD, Bayliss, A, Dunne, J, Barański, MZ, Denaire, A, Lefranc, P, Di Lernia, S, Roffet-Salque, M & Smyth, J (2020). Accurate compound-specific 14 C dating of archaeological pottery vessels. Nature 580, 506–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, XQ, Chen, SP, Zhou, XL, Li, JZ, Zhu, BQ, Mu, YK & Wang, JY (1984). Research on the fundamentals of ceramics of Southern Song Altar Guan ware and Longquan Ge ware. J Chin Ceram Soc 2, 12.Google Scholar
Cui, M, Liu, C & Shi, K (2005). The effect of graphite/carbon on the performance of crylic acid series water-based conductive ink. J Taiyuan Univ Technol 2, 132–141.Google Scholar
Duan, H 段鸿莺, Ding, Y 丁银忠, Han, Q 韩倩, Lyn, C 吕成龙, Lei, Y 雷勇 & Shi, N 史宁昌 (2018 a). Gugong bowuyuan cang chuanshi geyao, mingqing fang geyao ji xiangguan yaozhi cipian de guanlian yanjiu 故宫博物院藏传世哥窑、明清仿哥瓷器及相关窑址瓷片的关联研究 [The connection between the Ge ware pieces and Ming-Qing Ge-style ware from the collections of the Palace Museum and sherds from related kiln sites]. Gugong Bowuyuan Yuankan 故宫博物院院刊 6, 23–33.Google Scholar
Duan, H 段鸿莺, Lyn, C 吕成龙, Li, H 李合, Ding, Y 丁银忠, Li, Y 李媛 & Miao, J 苗建民 (2018 b). Chuanshi geyao qiwu d wusun keji fenxi 传世哥窑器物的无损科技分析 [Nondestructive technological analysis of Heirloom Ge wares]. Zhonguo Wenwu Kexue Yanjiu 中国文物科学研究 4, 55–62.Google Scholar
Dunne, J, Rebay-Salisbury, K, Salisbury, RB, Frisch, A, Walton-Doyle, C & Evershed, RP (2019). Milk of ruminants in ceramic baby bottles from prehistoric child graves. Nature 574, 246–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eiselt, BS, Dudgeon, J, Darling, JA, Paucar, EN, Glascock, MD & Woodson, MK (2019). In-situ sourcing of hematite paints on the surface of Hohokam red-on-buff ceramics using laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) and instrumental neutron activation analysis. Archaeometry 61, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, X 冯先铭 (1981). Geyao wenti zhiyi 哥窑问题质疑 [Questioning ‘Ge ware’]. Gugong Bowuyuan Yuankan 故宫博物院院刊 1, 33–35.Google Scholar
Fengye, Z & Liangyuan, H (2011). Microwave digestion-application of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry to the safety indicators of As and Pb in tipping paper. J Chuzhou Univ 2, 17–21.Google Scholar
Gehres, B & Querré, G (2018). New applications of LA–ICP–MS for sourcing archaeological ceramics: Microanalysis of inclusions as fingerprints of their origin. Archaeometry 60, 750–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geng, B 耿宝昌 (1995). Songdai geyao bianxi: Jiangyi lidai fang geyao 宋代哥窑辨析-兼议历代仿哥窑 [An analysis of Ge ware: Discussing imitation Ge wares]. Gugong Bowuyuan Yuankan 故宫博物院院刊 1, 55–62.Google Scholar
Gompertz, G (1958). Chinese Celadon Wares. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hay, J (2010). Sensuous Surfaces: The Decorative Object in Early Modern China. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Hou, Z, Xiao, Y, Shen, J & Yu, C (2020). In situ rutile U-Pb dating based on zircon calibration using LA-ICP-MS, geological applications in the Dabie orogen, China. J Asian Earth Sci 192, 104261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y, Yan, L-T, Sun, H-Y & Feng, X-Q (2018). A study on black-body celadon excavated in the Altar Guan and literature Ge (lLngquan Ge) kilns by EDXRF. Archaeometry 60, 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y 蒋艺 (2018). “Gugongbowuyuan geyao xueshu yantaohui” zongshu “故宫博物院哥窑学术研讨会“综述” [Overview of ‘The Palace Museum's Ge ware symposium’]. Gugong Bowuyuan Yuankan故宫博物院院刊 2, 12–29.Google Scholar
Kerr, R & Wood, N (2004). Joseph Needham Science and Technology in China, Vol 5 Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Part XII: Ceramic Technology.Google Scholar
Lahlil, S, Li, W & Xu, JM (2013). Crack patterns morphology of ancient Chinese wares. Old Potter's Almanack 18, 1–9.Google Scholar
Lahlil, S, Xu, J & Li, W (2015). Influence of manufacturing parameters on the crackling process of ancient Chinese glazed ceramics. J Cult Herit 16, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, CZ, Yang, J, Yao, LX, Lu, WC & Chen, NY (2005). Study on sherds excavated in Laohudong kiln by chemometrics method. Chin J Anal Chem 33, 1465–1468.Google Scholar
Li, H (1993). A re-definition of Ge ware and related problems. Orientations (Hong Kong) 24, 76–78.Google Scholar
Li, H, Wei, X, Li, W, Liang, G & Miao, J (2010). Nondestructive analysis of the components of the Song-Dynasty Guan wares collected in the Palace Museum by EDXRF. Palace Mus J 5, 137–146.Google Scholar
Li, Y 李运之 (2021). Bufen chuanshi geyao shi beisong guanyao 部分传世哥窑是北宋官窑[The provenance of the Ge ware is the Guan ware of the Northern Song Dynasty]. Dongfang Shoucang 东方收藏 7, 60–66.Google Scholar
Li, Z (2020). Beyond firing: The chaine operatoire research of Heirloom Ge ware. Archaeol Rev Camb 35, 112–125.Google Scholar
Li, Z, Doherty, C & Hein, A (2021). Rediscovering the largest kiln site in the middle Yangtze River Valley: Insights into Qingbai and grey-greenish ware production at Husi kiln site based on bulk chemical analysis. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 13, 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y, Hu, Z, Gao, S, Günther, D, Xu, J, Gao, C & Chen, H (2008). In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem Geol 257, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luong, ET & Houk, RS (2003). Determination of carbon isotope ratios in amino acids, proteins, and oligosaccharides by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14, 295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, Q, Wen, R, Yu, Y, Wang, L, Li, M, Cai, L, Ping, L, Zhao, Z, Wang, D & Wang, X (2022). Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of Chinese lead-barium glass: Combining multivariate kernel density estimation and maximum mean discrepancy to reinterpret the raw glass used for producing lead-barium glass. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 14, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, J, Lv, C-L, Li, H & Chen, T-M (2012). Non-destructive analysis of ‘original' Song Dynasty Guan wares and later imitations from the Palace Museum collections, Beijing. Archaeometry 54, 955–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecci, A, Degl'Innocenti, E, Giorgi, G, Ontiveros, MÁC, Cantini, F, Potrony, ES, Alós, C & Miriello, D (2016). Organic residue analysis of experimental, medieval, and post-medieval glazed ceramics. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 8, 879–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, X 丘小君 & Chang, B 常斌 (2016). Cong geyao ‘jinsi tiexian’ tanqi 从哥窑‘金丝铁线’谈起 [Insights into the black and brown cracks of Ge ware]. Wenwu Jianding yu Jianshang 文物鉴定与鉴赏 11, 66–71.Google Scholar
Ren, M, Guan, L, Wang, N, Xu, C, Cui, Y, He, D, Wang, C & Yang, Y (2022). Investigation of the manufacture development of early Chinese ink in the Western Han Dynasty. Archaeometry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, M, Wang, R & Yang, Y (2018). Identification of the proto-inkstone by organic residue analysis: A case study from the changle cemetery in China. Herit Sci 6, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riisom, M, Gammelgaard, B, Lambert, IH & Stürup, S (2018). Development and validation of an ICP-MS method for quantification of total carbon and platinum in cell samples and comparison of open-vessel and microwave-assisted acid digestion methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal 158, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, Y (2019). Geyao de Xinfaxian 哥窑的新发现 [The New Discovery of the Ge Ware]. Beijing: Beijing Cultural and Heritage Press.Google Scholar
Swider, JR, Hackley, VA & Winter, J (2003). Characterization of Chinese ink in size and surface. J Cult Herit 4, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, W, Yan, T, Wang, F, Yang, J, Wu, J, Wang, J, Yue, T & Li, Z (2019). Rapid fabrication of wearable carbon nanotube/graphite strain sensor for real-time monitoring of plant growth. Carbon 147, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Palace Museum (2017). Selection of Ge Ware - The Palace Museum Collection and Archaeological Discoveries. Beijing: the Palace Museum Press.Google Scholar
Tochilin, C, Dickinson, WR, Felgate, MW, Pecha, M, Sheppard, P, Damon, FH, Bickler, S & Gehrels, GE (2012). Sourcing temper sands in ancient ceramics with U–Pb ages of detrital zircons: A southwest pacific test case. J Archaeol Sci 39, 2583–2591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J, Luo, H, Li, Q, Li, W & Wu, J (2009). Composition model and microstructure characteristic of Yue ware, Longquan ware and Southern-Song Guan ware. J Chin Ceram Soc 38, 140.Google Scholar
Xiang, K 项坤鹏 (2012). Zhongguo gutaoci xuehui 2011 niandu nianhui ji longquanyao xueshu yantaohui zongshu 中国古陶瓷学会2011年年会暨龙泉窑学术研讨会综述 [Review of the 2011 annual meeting of the Chinese society of ancient ceramics and Longquan kiln symposium]. Palace Mus J 故宫博物院院刊 2, 21–20.Google Scholar
Yan, L, Huang, Y, Liu, M, Liu, L, Li, L, Feng, S & Feng, X (2015). Study on the compositional features of Longquan celadon with black body and Southern Song Guan wares from Laohudong using EDXRF. J Archaeol Sci Rep 4, 395–400.Google Scholar
Yang, H-C, Chen, Z, Xie, Y, Wang, J, Elam, JW, Li, W & Darling, SB (2019). Chinese ink: A powerful photothermal material for solar steam generation. Adv Mater Interfaces 6, 1801252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, R 周仁 & Zhang, F 张福康 (1964). Guanyu chuanshi “songgeyao” shaozao didian de chubu yanjiu 关于传世“宋哥窑”烧造地点的初步研究 [A preliminary study of the location of the ‘Song Ge kiln’]. Wenwu 文物 1, 8–13.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S11

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 97 KB