Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:29:42.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HRTEM Analysis of Defect Structures in AIN Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Jason R. Heffelfinger
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, P. O. Box 969, Livermore, CA, 94551-0969
Kevin F. McCarty
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, P. O. Box 969, Livermore, CA, 94551-0969
Douglas L. Medlin
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, P. O. Box 969, Livermore, CA, 94551-0969
Get access

Extract

HRTEM analysis and conventional TEM techniques were used to determine the nature and density of defects in AIN thin films grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE). Extended defects, which act as phonon scattering sites, are detrimental to the thermal properties for which AIN is sought. [1] Previous research on defect structures in AIN has focused primarily on bulk materials. [2-5] This investigation extends previous studies by concentrating on defects native to AIN thin films.

The thin films for this study were grown by MBE onto annealed Al2O3 (corundum structure) substrates with a nominal (0001) surface orientation. The steps and structure of such (0001) Al2O3 surfaces have been previously characterized. [6] Films with thicknesses of 50 to 120 nm were grown at substrate temperatures between 700°C and 900°C. An RF driven source for atomic nitrogen and an aluminum effusion cell were used to generate deposition fluxes. TEM samples were prepared in plan-view and cross-section using conventional dimpling and ion milling techniques.

Type
Atomic Structure and Mechanisms at Interfaces in Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Norton, M. G., Hybrid Circuits, 20 (1989) 18.Google Scholar
2.Seifert, , Berger, A. and Muller, W. F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 [4] (1992) 873.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04153.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.McCartney, M. R., Youngman, R. A. and Teller, R. G., Ultramicroscopy, 40 (1992) 291.10.1016/0304-3991(92)90126-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Westwood, A. D. and Notis, M. R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74 [6] (1991) 1226.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04091.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Delavignette, P., Kirkpatrick, H. B. and Amelinckx, S, J. Appl. Phys., 32 [6] (1961) 1098.10.1063/1.1736166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Heffelfinger, J. R., Bench, M. W. and Carter, C. B., Surf. Sci., 370 [1] (1997) L168.10.1016/S0039-6028(96)01123-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. This reseach is support by the U. S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract number DE-AC04-94-AL85000.Google Scholar