Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:55:51.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Correction of the 3-Fold Astigmatism on HREM Lattice Imaging With Information Below 100 Pm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Y.C. Wang ,
A. Fitzgerald ,
E.C. Nelson ,
C. Song ,
M.A. O’Keefe  and
C. Kisielowski
Y.C. Wang
Affiliation:
FEI and Philips
A. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
University of Dundee /UK
E.C. Nelson
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Berkeley, CA94720/, USA
C. Song
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Berkeley, CA94720/, USA
M.A. O’Keefe
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Berkeley, CA94720/, USA
C. Kisielowski
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Berkeley, CA94720/, USA
Get access

Extract

High resolution electron microscopes with field emission sources opened the possibility to investigate solids on a 100 pm range. Either electron holograpy can be applied or an information limit that may even extend into a region below 100 pm can be exploited to reach this goal [1]. However, lens aberrations such as the three-fold astigmatism often complicate an image interpretation in the 100 pm range or even make it impossible [2]. On the other hand, there is growing need to understand physical processes at a mono-atomic level in order to further develop artificially structured materials such as nano-crystals, ceramic coatings or semiconductors. Commonly, such materials contain light elements like C, N, or O with bond lengths that are shorter than a typical 180 pm point resolution of a high resolution, electron microscope. The carbon-carbon distance of 150 pm is the shortest bond length value in crystalline solids. Moreover, any projection of a diamond lattice along a low index zone axis for lattice imaging leads to a reduced C-C distance.

Type
Future of Microscopy: Ceramics, Composites, and Cement
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 5 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis '99, Microscopy Society of America 57th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 33rd Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon August 1-5, 1999 , August 1999 , pp. 822 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Voelkl, E., Lichte, H., Ultramicroscopy 32, 177, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[2] e.g Hawkes, P.W and Kasper, E., “Electron Optics”, Academic Press, London 1989, p. 297 ff.Google Scholar

[3] Wang, Y.C., O’Keefe, M.A., Pan, M., Nelson, E.C., and Kisielowski, C., Electron Microscopy 1998, Calderon Benavides, H.A., Yacaman, M.J. (eds), Inst. Of Phys. Publishing, Bristol 1998, p. 57Google ScholarPubMed

[4] Bleeker, A., Overwijk, H.H.F., and Otten, M.T., Microscopy and Microanalyses 1996, 418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[5] Diffractograms in figure 2 are a courtesy of Dr.Pan, M., Gatan, Google Scholar