Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:26:03.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CRYO-Tem Measurements of Membrane Elasticity in Equilibrium Vesicle Systems: Two Distinct Mechanisms of Stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

B. Coldren
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA93106
H.T. Jung
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA93106
J. Zasadzinski
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA93106
Get access

Extract

Aqueous mixtures of oppositely charged surfactants spontaneously form equilibrium phases of unilamellar vesicles.1 The wide variety of surfactants that display this behavior allows control over vesicle charge, size, and polydispersity. This may be useful for new applications in drug delivery, nanomaterials synthesis, and as tests of theoretical concepts of membrane organization and interactions.

A subtle competition between the entropy of mixing and the elastic properties of surfactant and lipid bilayers determines their phase behavior and morphology. The curvature energy per unit area of bilayer, fc, is

where R1 and R2 are the principle radii of curvature, K is the curvature modulus, and is the saddle-splay modulus. The spontaneous curvature, l/ro, is nonzero only if there is asymmetry between the two sides of the bilayer.

Type
Biomedical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Kaler, E.W., Murthy, A.K., Rodriguez, B.E. & Zasadzinski, J.A.Science 245, 13711374 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Helfrich, W.Z.Naturfosch 28, 693703 (1973).Google Scholar
3.Safran, S.A., Picus, P. & Andelman, D.Science 248, 354355 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Herve, P., Roux, D., Bellocq, A.M., Nallet, F. & Gulik-Krzywicki, T. J.Physique II (France) 3, 12551270 (1993).Google Scholar
5.Denkov, N.D., Yoshimura, H., Kouyama, T., Walz, J. & Nagayama, K.Biophysical Journal 74, 14091420 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar