Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:24:20.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Multislice Computer Programs for Electron Scattering Simulations and The Bloch Wave Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

C. Koch
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
J.M. Zuo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
Get access

Extract

As the demand for quantitative analysis of Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) images and diffraction patterns increases, questions arise about the reliability of computer simulations using different software packages and algorithms that are used for comparison with the experiment. Here, we compared five multislice programs, which are (with the exception of Cerius2) freely available, with each other and also a Bloch wave code. Since multislice method propagates the electron beams through the crystal slice by slice, the development of differences between the programs can easily be seen by comparing amplitudes and phases of different beams vs. thickness (Pendelloesung plot). We calculated Pendelloesung plots for InP [001] in zone axis and tilted beam orientations and the Si [111] forbidden reflections using the following codes: Cerius2, NCEMSS, Autoslic3, Multis4, EMS5 and an updated Bloch wave code written by J.M. Zuo4.

Type
The Theory and Practice of Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1. HRTEM module in Cerius 2, by Molecular Simulations Inc.Google Scholar
2.O'Keefe, M. and Kilaas, R., NCEM UC Berkley (http://ncem.lbl.gov/frames/software.htm)Google Scholar
3.Kirkland, E.J., Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy, New York Plenum (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Spence, J.C.H., Zuo, J.M., Electron Microdiffraction, New York Plenum (1992) (code by Zuo, J.M.)Google Scholar
5.Stadelmann, P. A., I2M-EPFEL, CH-1015 Lausanne, SwitzalandGoogle Scholar
6. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant NSF-9814055, we also thank Dr. E.J. Kirkland for his helpful advice.Google Scholar