Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:53:35.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Surface Study of Atomic Images With Variable Temperature UHF-AFM and STM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M. Iwatsuki
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd. Electron Optics Division, 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196
K. Suzuki
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd. Electron Optics Division, 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196
S. Kitamura
Affiliation:
JEOL Ltd. Electron Optics Division, 1-2 Musashino 3-chome, Akishima, Tokyo 196
M. Kersker
Affiliation:
JEOL USA Inc., 11 Dearborn Rd, Peabody, Mass., 01960
Get access

Extract

The AFM technique has made a remarkable progress recently. However, relatively few studies using the UHV-AFM have been reported compared to those using atmospheric AFMs or UHV-STMs. Atomic-resolution images of the clean sample surface in ultrahigh vacuum, which is relatively active and not observable in atmosphere, have been reported only few examples. The intense reaction between the tip of the cantilever and the sample in contact mode imaging, one of the techniques used in atomic imaging in atmosphere, often damages the surface of the sample, making it difficult to acquire atomic-resolution images in UHV.

In order to reduce the strong interaction between the tip and the sample, the noncontact imaging technique for the UHV-AFM (NC-AFM: JAFM-4500XT) has been developed. However, none of the atmospheric NC-AFMs has succeeded in achieving atomic level resolution.

Type
Scanned Probe Microscopy: Much More Than Just Beautiful Images
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1)Kitamura, S. and Iwatsuki, M., JEOL News, 32E (1995) 42.Google Scholar
2)Kitamura, S. and Iwatsuki, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1995) L145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3)Giessibl, F.J., Science 267, (1995) 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar