Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:46:11.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colocalization of mRNAs by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. G. Baskin
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Biological Structure, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA98195, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Research Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA98108
J. F. Breininger
Affiliation:
Departments of Medicine and Biological Structure, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA98195, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Research Service, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA98108
Get access

Extract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), long the method of choice for chromosomal cytogenetics, is becoming recognized as a powerful method for correlative histochemical detection of multiple messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) in cells. The technique is based upon the principle of the binding of a labeled strand of DNA (an oligonucleotide probe) or RNA (a riboprobe) to complementary strands of mRNA. In the traditional in situ hybridization method, nucleic acid probes are labeled with radioactive isotopes and the hybrids are localized by autoradiography. More recently, labeling of the probes with digoxigenin, biotin, or fluorescein has allowed nonisotopic detection of probe-mRNA hybrids with immunoenzymatic techniques that are based on peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase histochemistry, in which the results are observed as brightfield stains. FISH is similar to conventional nonisotopic in situ hybridization except that the labeled nucleic acid probes are detected by fluorescence microscopy.

The FISH technique has advantages for performing correlative histochemistry. The results of a FISH protocol can be observed within a few hours of completing the hybridization protocol instead of waiting for days as is the case with isotopic methods. FISH permits cellular resolution and facilitates multiple labeling, where in situ hybridization probes can be resolved at the level of individual cells (Hahn et al. 1998).

Type
Biological Labeling and Correlative Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baskin, DG, Breininger, JF, Schwartz, MW (1999a) Leptin receptor mRNA identifies a subpopulation of neuropeptide Y neurons activated by fasting in rat hypothalamus. Diabetes 48, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, DG, Schwartz, MWet al. (1999b) Leptin receptor long form splice variant protein expression in neuron cell bodies of the brain and colocalization with neuropeptide Y mRNA in the arcuate nucleus. J Histochem Cytochem 46, in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, TM, Breininger, JF, Baskin, DG, Schwartz, MW (1998) Colocalization of agouti-related protein and neuropeptide Y in arcuate nucleus neurons activated by fasting. Nature Neurosci 1, 271272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trembleau, A, Bloom, FE (1995) Enhanced sensitivity for light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization with multiple simultaneous non-radioactive oligodeoxynucleotide probes. J Histochem Cytochem 43:829841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed