Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:00:28.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Charging Processes in Low Vacuum Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

Bradley L. Thiel ,
Milos Toth  and
John P. Craven
Bradley L. Thiel
Affiliation:
Polymers and Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
Milos Toth
Affiliation:
Polymers and Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
John P. Craven
Affiliation:
Polymers and Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
Get access

Abstract

A framework is presented for understanding charging processes in low vacuum scanning electron microscopy. We consider the effects of electric fields generated above and below the specimen surface and their effects on various processes taking place in the system. These processes include the formation of an ionic space charge, field-enhanced electron emission, charge trapping and dissipation, and electron–ion recombination. The physical mechanisms behind each of these processes are discussed, as are the microscope operating conditions under which each process is most effective. Readily observable effects on gas gain curves, secondary electron images, and X-ray spectra are discussed.

Keywords

environmental SEMlow vacuum SEMimagingmicroanalysischargingdielectricsinsulators
Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , December 2004 , pp. 711 - 720
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Battaglin, G., Della Mea, G., De Marchi, G., Mazzoldi, P., Miotello, A., & Guglielmi, M. (1982). Field-assisted sodium migration in glasses during medium-energy proton irradiation. J Phys C 15, 5623–5627.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (1986). Some considerations on the electric field induced in insulators by electron bombardment. J Appl Phys 59, 1418–1430.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (1999a). Some considerations on the secondary electron emission, δ, from e− irradiated insulators. J Appl Phys 85, 1–11.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (1999b). Mechanisms of charging in electron spectroscopy. J Electr Spect Rel Phen 105, 155–185.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (2001). About the secondary electron yield and the sign of charging of electron irradiated insulators. Eur Phys J AP 15, 167–172.Google Scholar
Cazaux, J. (2004). About the mechanisms of charging in SEM, EPMA, and ESEM with their time evolution. Microsc Microanal 10, 670–684 (this issue).Google Scholar
Craven, J.P., Baker, F.S., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2002). Consequences of positive ions upon imaging in low vacuum scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 205, 96–105.Google Scholar
Gauyacq, J.P. & Borisov, A.G. (1998). Charge transfer in atom-surface collisions: Effect of the presence of adsorbates on the surface. J Phys: Condens Matter 10, 6585–6619.Google Scholar
Hahn, Y. (1997). Electron–ion recombination processes—An overview. Rep Prog Phys 60, 691–759.Google Scholar
Jbara, O., Cazaux, J., & Trebbia, P. (1995). Sodium diffusion in glasses during electron irradiation. J Appl Phys 78, 868–875.Google Scholar
Joy, D.C. & Joy, C.S. (1996). Low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Micron 27, 247–263.Google Scholar
Jurek, K., Gedeon, O., & Hulinsky, V. (1998). Potassium migration in silica glasses during electron beam irradiation. Mikrochemica Acta 15 ( Suppl.), 269–272.Google Scholar
Kucheyev, S.O., Toth, M., Phillips, M.R., Williams, J.S., Jagadish, C., & Li, G. (2002). X-ray spectrometry investigation of electrical isolation in GaN. J Appl Phys 91, 3940–3942.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, J.L. (1963). Oxygen outgassing caused by electron bombardment of glass. J Appl Phys 34, 1786–1791.Google Scholar
Massey, H.S.W. & Bierhop, E.H.S. (1969). Electronic and Ionic Impact Phenomena. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Melchinger, A. & Hofmann, S. (1995). Dynamic double layer model: Description of time dependent charging phenomena in insulators under electron beam irradiation. J Appl Phys 15, 6224–6232.Google Scholar
Miotello, A. & Mazzoldi, P. (1982). Numerical analysis of field-assisted sodium migration in electron-irradiated glasses. J Phys C 15, 5615–5621.Google Scholar
Pawley, J.B. (1972). Charging artifacts in the scanning electron microscope. In Scanning Electron Microscopy, Johari, O.M. (Ed.), pp. 153–160. Chicago: ITT Research Institute.
Reimer, L. (1985). Scanning Electron Microscopy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Shaffner, T.J. (1973). The SEM-specimen system—A macroscopic mathematical model. In Scanning Electron Microscopy, Johari, O.M. (Ed.), pp. 293–300. Chicago: ITT Research Institute.
Shaffner, T.J. & Hearle, J.W.S. (1976). Recent advances in understanding specimen charging. In Scanning Electron Microscopy, Johari, O.M. (Ed.), pp. 61–70. Chicago: ITT Research Institute.
Stokes, D.J., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2000). Dynamic secondary electron contrast effects in liquid systems studied by environmental scanning electron microscopy. Scanning 22, 357–365.Google Scholar
Thiel, B.L., Bache, I.C., Fletcher, A.L., Meredith, P., & Donald, A.M. (1997). An improved model for gaseous amplification in the environmental SEM. J Microsc 187, 143–157.Google Scholar
Thiel, B.L. (2004). Master curves for gas amplification in low vacuum and environmental scanning electron microscopy. Ultramicrosc 99, 35–47.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Kucheyev, S.O., Williams, J.S., Jagadish, C., Phillips, M.R., & Li, G. (2000). Imaging charge trap distributions in GaN using environmental scanning electron microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 77, 1342–1344.Google Scholar
Toth, M. & Phillips, M.R. (2000). The effects of space charge on contrast in images obtained using the environmental scanning electron microscope. Scanning 22, 319–325.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Phillips, M.R., Craven, J.P., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2002a). Electric fields produced by electron irradiation of insulators in a low vacuum environment. J Appl Phys 91, 4492–4499.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Phillips, M.R., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2002b). Electron imaging of dielectrics under simultaneous electron–ion irradiation. J Appl Phys 91, 4479–4491.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2002c). On the role of electron–ion recombination in low vacuum scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 205, 86–95.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2002d). Quantification of electron–ion recombination in an electron-beam-irradiated gas capacitor. J Phys D 35, 1796–1804.Google Scholar
Toth, M., Thiel, B.L., & Donald, A.M. (2003). Interpretation of secondary electron images obtained using a low vacuum SEM. Ultramicroscopy 94, 71–87.Google Scholar
Van Veld, R.D. & Shaffner, T.J. (1971). Charging artifacts in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Electron Microscopy (ITT) 17–21.Google Scholar
von Engel, A. (1955). Ionized Gases. Oxford: Clarendon Press.