Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:32:56.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Big Tripod Polisher; 16 Years of Imaging Surfaes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

L.D. Marks*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL60208, USA
Get access

Extract

Electron Microscopy of surfaces has always been a topic for a few stubborn souls. In addition to the standard headaches of electron microscopes (maintenance, breakdown) one has to handle the additional complications of maintaining a clean enough vacuum to make the results mean anything. (Without vacuum control the structures observed may be due to the contaminants, and hence meaningless.) To complicate things further, in addition to conventional ex-situ sample preparation one has to clean and equilibriate the surface while still retaining thin enough regions for useful study. The final step is to work out which techniques provide surface information and learn how to exploit them. It is appropriate to look at some of the key elements that are needed.

Sample Handling: The key to success with surfaces is not really the microscopy, but instead the sample treatment. The first crucial element is control over the sputter cleaning process.(While simple heating would be less damaging, if one wants to look at something other than silicon sputter cleaning is a must.)

Type
A. Howie Symposium: Celebration of Pioneering Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ai, R., et al., Ultramicroscopy, 39 (1991) 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jayaram, G., Plass, R. and Marks, L.D., Interface Science 2 (1995) 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Collazo-Davila, C.et al., Journal of the Microscopy Society of America 1 (1995) 267.Google Scholar
4.Marks, L.D. and Smith, D.J., Nature 303 (1983) 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Marks., L.D.Phys. Rev. Letts. 51 (1983) 1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bonevich, J.E. and Marks, L.D., Microscopy (1992) 95.Google Scholar
7.Marks, L.D. and Plass, R., Phys. Rev. Letts. 75 (1995) 2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bengu, E.et al., Phys. Rev. Letts. 11 (1996) 20.Google Scholar
9.Collazo-Davila, C.,Grozea, D.and Marks, L.D., Phys. Rev. Letts. 80 (1998) 1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Marks, L.D.et al., Surface Reviews and Letters 5 (1998) 1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Richard, Plasset al., Phys. Rev. Letts. 81 (1998) 4891.Google Scholar