Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T14:29:09.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic Structure of a Symmetric 27°[001] Tilt Grain Boundary in MgO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Yanfa Yan
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee37831-6030
M. F. Chisholm
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee37831-6030
S. J. Pennycook
Affiliation:
Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee37831-6030
Get access

Extract

The atomic structure of a symmetric 27° [001] tilt grain boundary in MgO has been determined by high-resolution Z-contrast imaging using a 300 kV VG HB603U scanning transmission electron microscope with a 1.3 Å probe. The atomic configuration in the grain boundary core is found to be considerably less open than the structures proposed earlier for similar materials.

Fig. 1 shows the Z-contrast image of the grain boundary and the projected structure derived from the image. It is clearly seen that the boundary is a shared plane of atoms with the same atomic column density as a bulk crystal {100} plane. The boundary consists of an array of separated perfect edge dislocation cores with Burgers vector b= a<100>. It is interesting to point out that the spacing between dislocation cores in the boundary is not uniform (as seen in Fig. 2). The arrangement, which follows the Fibonacci sequence, can be accurately predicted.

Type
Atomic Structure and Mechanisms at Interfaces in Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kingery, W. D., Am, J.. Ceram. Soc. 57, (1974)1.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1974.tb11350.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, D. M. and Tasker, P. W., Philos. Mag. A 47, (1983)817.10.1080/01418618308243121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkle, K. L. and Smith, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, (1987)2887.10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J.et al., Philos. Mag. A 74, (1996)407.10.1080/01418619608242151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, A.P., Acta Metall., 36, (1988)1291.10.1016/0001-6160(88)90281-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altermatt, D. and Brown, I.D., Acta Cryst. B41, (1985)240.10.1107/S0108768185002051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This research was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464 with Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation, and in part by ORNL's Laboratory Directed Research and Development Fund and by appointment to ORNL Postdoctoral Research Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.Google Scholar