Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:00:55.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 Years In A Stereology Laboratory: A Point By Point History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

John M. Basgen*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN55455
Get access

Extract

In many experimental situations there is some three dimensional particle that is of interest to the microscopist. To obtain morphometric information about the particle, the microscopist must section some reference space that contains the particle or component of interest, but after sectioning, the reference space and component are reduced to a 2-D sample. This sample no longer contains 3-D structures but only 2-D profiles of the reference space and component.

Stereology can be used to obtain 3-D information from 2-D samples. These samples can be micrographs or digital images, or they can even be the cut surface of the 3-D reference space. The four most basic parameters measured using stereological techniques are volume (3-D), area (2-D), length (1-D), and number (0-D). When measuring these parameters it is often advisable to first measure the density of the component within the reference space, next measure the volume of the reference space, and finally multiply the density by the reference volume to obtain the actual structural parameter.

Type
Msa Technologists Forum Special Topic Presentation
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Weibel, E.R., Stereological Methods Volume 1, Academic Press, (1979)p.lGoogle Scholar
2.Basgen, J. M. et al., Journal of Immunological Methods, 124 (1989)77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Basgen, J.M. et al., Nephron, 50 (1988)182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sterio, D.C., Journal of Microscopy, 134 (1984)127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Gundersen, H.J.G. and Jensen, E.B., Journal Microscopy, 147 (1987)229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Steffes, M. W. et al., Laboratory Investigation, 49 (1983)82Google Scholar
7.Ellis, E. N., et al., Methods in Diabetes Research Volume II, John Wiley & Sons, (1986)p.633Google Scholar
8.Steffes, M. W. et al., Diabetes, 29 (1980)509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Basgen, J.M. et al., Kidney International, 45 (1994) 1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Gundersen, H.J.G. and Østerby, R., Journal of Microscopy, 121 (1981)65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Howard, C.V. and Reed, M.G., Unbiased Stereology, Bios Scientific Publishers, 1998p.l51Google Scholar