Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T06:44:53.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some decomposition numbers for Hecke algebras of general linear groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Matthew J. Richards
Matthew J. Richards
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The theorem which is still known as Nakayama's Conjecture shows how the modular characters of the symmetric group Sn can be divided into blocks of various weights, those with the same weight having similar properties. In fact, all blocks of weight one have essentially the same decomposition numbers and these are easy to describe. In recent work, Scopes [16, 17] has shown that there are essentially only finitely many possibilities for the decomposition numbers for blocks of any given weight, and has given a bound for the number. We develop the combinatorics implicit in her work, and so establish an improved bound.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , April 1996 , pp. 383 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Dipper, R. and James, G. D.Representations of Hecke algebras of general linear groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 52 (1986), 20–52.Google Scholar
[2]Dipper, R. and James, G. D.Blocks and idempotents of Hecke algebras of general linear groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 54 (1987), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dipper, R. and James, G. D.The q-Schur algebra. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 59 (1989), 23–50.Google Scholar
[4]Geck, M.Brauer trees of Hecke algebras. Comm. Alg. 20 (1992), 2937–2973.Google Scholar
[5]James, G. D.The irreducible representations of the symmetric groups. Bull. London Math. Soc. 8 (1976), 229–232.Google Scholar
[6]James, G. D.Some combinatorial results involving Young diagrams. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 83 (1978), 1–10.Google Scholar
[7]James, G. D.The representation theory of the symmetric groups, Lecture Notes in Math. Vol. 682 (Springer Verlag, 1978).Google Scholar
[8]James, G. D.The decomposition of tensors over fields of prime characteristic. Math. Z. 172 (1980), 161–178.Google Scholar
[9]James, G. D.The decomposition matrices of GLn(q) for n ≤ 10. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 60 (1990), 225–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]James, G. D. and Kerber, A.The representation theory of the symmetric group. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 16 (Addison-Wesley, 1981).Google Scholar
[11]Littlewood, D. E.Modular representations of symmetric groups. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 209 (1951), 333–353.Google Scholar
[12]Martin, S.On the ordinary quiver of the principal block of certain symmetric groups. Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 40 (1989), 209–233.Google Scholar
[13]Martin, S.Ordinary quivers for symmetric groups, II. Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 41 (1990), 79–92.Google Scholar
[14]Mullineux, G.Bijections of p-regular partitions and p-modular irreducibles of the symmetric groups. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 20 (1979), 60–66.Google Scholar
[15]Schaper, K. D.Charakterformeln für Weyl-Moduln und Specht-Moduln in Primcharacteristik. Diplomarbeit, Universität Bonn, 1981.Google Scholar
[16]Scopes, J. C. Representations of the symmetric groups. D. Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1990.Google Scholar
[17]Scopes, J. C.Cartan matrices and Morita equivalence for blocks of the symmetric groups. J. Algebra 142 (1991), 441–455.Google Scholar