Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:14:38.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reciprocity for Gauss sums on finite abelian groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1998

VLADIMIR TURAEV
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée, Université Louis Pasteur – C.N.R.S., 7 rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg, France

Abstract

A classical reciprocity formula for Gauss sums due to Cauchy, Dirichlet, and Kronecker states that

formula here

where a, b are nonzero integers and w∈ℚ such that ab+2aw∈2ℤ. For a detailed proof and historical background, see [4, chapter IX]. Various versions of formula (1) have been extensively studied in connection with transformation properties of theta functions. A version of (1) for multivariate Gauss sums was first obtained by A. Krazer [10] in 1912, see also [2, 5, 11, 14]. Krazer's formula generalizes the case w=0 of (1) via replacing one of the numbers a, b by an integer quadratic form of several variables.

Recently, Florian Deloup [6] found a new and most beautiful reciprocity formula for multivariate Gauss sums. His formula is a far reaching generalization of Krazer's result. Roughly speaking, Deloup replaces both numbers a, b with quadratic forms. Deloup involves Wu classes of quadratic forms which allows him to remove the evenness condition appearing in Krazer's formulation. However, Deloup's formula covers only the cases w=0 and w=b/2 of (1).

In this paper we establish a more general reciprocity for Gauss sums including the Krazer and Deloup formulas and formula (1) in its full generality. Our reciprocity law involves two quadratic forms and a so-called rational Wu class, as defined below.

The original proofs of Cauchy, Dirichlet, Kronecker and Krazer are analytical and involve a study of a limit of a transformation formula for theta-functions. Deloup's proof goes by a reduction to the case w=b/2 of (1) based on a careful study of Witt groups of quadratic forms. Our proof is more direct and uses only (a generalization of) the van der Blij computation of Gauss sums via signatures of integer quadratic forms. In particular, our argument provides a new proof of (1).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge Philosophical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)