Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:51:55.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The concept of ‘rigorous proof’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Extract

Mathematicians of every age have been seen to criticize the proofs of their predecessors or of their contemporaries as ‘not being rigorous’; and often those which they proposed as replacements for the defective proofs were in their turn considered inadequate by the succeeding generation. This apparent repeated putting into question of mathematicians' arguments at length led some people to think these arguments contained a hidden flaw which meant that a proof could never be found unassailable by any criticism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Reprinted from Jean Dieudonné Mathematics - the music of reason translated by H. G. and J. C. Dales, (Springer-Verlag 1992) by kind permission of Springer-Verlag and the executors of the Dieudonné estate.

References

* Reprinted from Jean Dieudonné Mathematics - the music of reason translated by H. G. and J. C. Dales, (Springer-Verlag 1992) by kind permission of Springer-Verlag and the executors of the Dieudonné estate.