Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:01:40.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2213. On the differentiation of a function of a function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

W. L. C. Sargent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Mathematical Notes
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 35 , Issue 312 , May 1951 , pp. 121 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Mathematical Gazette, XXXIII, 202.

† It was pointed out by Carslaw (Bull. American Math. Soc., vol. 29) in 1923 that proofs given in standard English books of that date were not complete. For references to complete proofs in earlier foreign books, see Carslaw, loc. cit.

‡ See, for instance, Phillips, E. G., A Course of Analysis, p. 229.Google Scholar

§ For a complete proof using the method of derivatives, see G. H. Hardy, Pure Mathematics (4th and later editions).

* The notation used is that found in Phillips, A Course of Analysis. The proof is essentially the same as that given in Verblunsky, Functions of a Real Variable, p. 64, but the difference in notation brings out the analogy with the proof of the theorem on the permanence of the first differential. For similar proofs, see also Chaundy, The Differential Calculus, p. 71 and Gibson, Advanced Calculus, p. 66.

† Cf. Durell and Robson, Elementary Calculus, Vol. 1, Phillips, A Course of Analysis, and Stewart, Advanced Calculus, where it is pointed out that the proof using (3) only holds if this restriction is made.