Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:00:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new observation of abnormal development in benthic foraminifers: VertebralinaCoscinospira togetherness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

Engin Meriç
Affiliation:
Moda Hüseyin Bey Sokak No: 15/4 34710 Kadıköy-İstanbul, Turkey
M. Baki Yokeş*
Affiliation:
Haliç Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik bölümü, 34093 Fınıdıkzade-İstanbul, Turkey
Niyazi Avşar
Affiliation:
Çukurova Üniversitesi, Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, 01330 Balcalı-Adana, Turkey
Cüneyt Bircan
Affiliation:
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Bölümü, Terzi oğlu kampusü, 17100 Çanakkale
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M.B. Yokeş, Haliç Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik bölümü, 34093 Fınıdıkzade-İstanbul, Turkey email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Abnormal test development in foraminifers is observed and environmental factors are suggested to be the main cause. Most of the abnormalities are aberrant test morphologies. In some cases twin, triplet and quadruplet formations are observed. The twins may sometimes be formed by two different species. In the framework of this study, foraminifer fauna of a submarine spring (Pamucak Cove, north-western Kuşadası, Aydın) was determined. A rich population of Amphistegina lobifera Larsen was found. Individuals with abnormal morphologies were also observed, but the most striking abnormality was the togetherness observed between two different families, Vertebralina striata d'Orbigny (Ficherinidae: Nodobacularinellinae) and Coscinospira hemprichii Ehrenberg (Peneroplidae).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almogi-Labin, A., Perelis-Grossovicz, L. and Raab, M. (1992) Living Ammonia from a hypersaline inland pool, Dead Sea Area, Israel. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 22, 257266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avşar, N., Meriç, E. and Ergin, M. (2001) İskenderun Körfezi bentojenik sedimentlerinin foraminifer içeriği. H. Ü. Yerbilimleri 24, 97112.Google Scholar
Berthold, Wu. (1971) Untersuchungen über die sexuelle Differenzierung der Foraminifere Patellina corrugata Williamson mit einem Beitrag zum Entwicklungsgang und Schalenbau. Archiv für Protistenkunde 113, 147184.Google Scholar
Boltovskoy, E., Scott, D.B. and Mediol, F.S. (1991) Morphological variations of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to changes in ecological parameters: a review. Journal of Paleontology 65, 175185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimerman, F. and Langer, M.R. (1991) Mediterranean foraminifera. Ljubljana: Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Akademia Scientiarum et Artium Slovenica, 118 pp., 93 plts.Google Scholar
Cushman, J.A. (1929) The foraminifera of the Atlantic Ocean. Part 6, Miliolidae, Opthalmidiidae and Ficherinidae. Bulletin of the US National Museum 104, 1129, 22 plates.Google Scholar
Elberling, B., Knudsen, K.L., Kristansen, P.H. and Asmund, G. (2003) Applying foraminiferal stratigraphy as a biomarker for heavy metal contamination and mining impact in a fiord in West Greenland. Marine Environmental Research 55, 235256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geslin, E., Debenay, J.-P. and Lesound, M. (1998) Abnormal wall textures and test deformation in Ammonia (hyaline foraminifer). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 28, 148156Google Scholar
Geslin, E., Stouff, V., Debenay, J.-P. and Lesourd, M. (2000) Environmental variation test abnormalities. Environmental Micropaleontology 15, 191215. In Martin, R.E. (ed.) Topics in Geobiology.Google Scholar
Geslin, E., Debenay, J.-P., Duleba, W. and Bonetti, C. (2002) Morphological abnormalities of foraminiferal tests in Brizalian environments; comparison between polluted and non-polluted areas. Marine Micropaleontomlogy 45, 151168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassé, P.-P. (1953) Traité de zoologie anatomie, sytématique, biologie, 1. Protozoaires: rhizopodes, actinopodes, sporozoaires, cnidosporidies. Paris: Masson et Cie Editeurs.Google Scholar
Hatta, A. and Ujiie, H. (1992) Benthic foraminifera from Coral Seas between Ishigaki and Iriomote Islands, Southern Ryukyu Island Arc, Northwestern Pasific. Bulletin of the College of Science, University of the Ryukyus 53, 49119; 54, 163–287.Google Scholar
Hottinger, L., Halicz, E. and Reiss, Z. (1993) Recent foraminiferida from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Ljubljana: Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Academia Scientiarum et Artium Slovenica, 179 pp., 230 plts.Google Scholar
Le Calvez, J. (1950) Recherches sur les foraminiferes—II. Place de la meiose et sexualité. Archive Zoologie Experimentale 87, 211243.Google Scholar
Le Calvez, J. (1953) Ordre des foraminiferes. In Grassé, P.P. (ed.) Traité de zoologie: anatomie, systématique, biologie. Volume 1, No. 2. Paris: Masson, pp. 149265.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr and Tappan, H. (1988) Foraminiferal genera and their classification. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 970 pp., 842 plts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr and Toppan, H. (1994) Foraminifera of the Sahul Shelf and Timor Sea. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research. Special Publication No. 31, 663 pp. 63 plates.Google Scholar
Meriç, E. (1996) Twin forms in foraminifera from the Quaternary sediments of Gulf of Izmit (Turkey). Revue de Paléobiologie 15, 461467.Google Scholar
Meriç, E. and Avşar, N. (2001) Benthic foraminiferal fauna of Gökçeada Island (Northern Aegean Sea) and its local variations. Acta Adriatica 42, 125149.Google Scholar
Meriç, E., Avşar, N. and Bergin, F. (2004a) Benthic foraminifera of eastern Aegean Sea (Turkey) systematics and autoecology. Istanbul: Chamber of Geological Engineers of Turkey and Turkish Marine Research Foundation, Publication No. 18, 306 pp., 33 plts.Google Scholar
Meriç, E., Avşar, N., Nazik, A., Eryilmaz, M. and Yücesoy-Eryilmaz, F. (2004b) Saros Körfezi'nin (Kuzey Ege Denizi) güncel bentik ve planktik foraminifer toplulukları ile çökel dağılımı. Ç. Ü. Yerbilimleri (Geosound) 44–45, 144.Google Scholar
Meriç, E., Görmüş, M., Nielsen, J.K., Avşar, N. and Ünsal, I. (2005) Significance of rare reproduction occurrences among recent nodosariids and other benthic foraminifera. Anales de Biologia 27, 85108.Google Scholar
Meriç, E., Görmüş, M., Avşar, N., Yokeş, M.B. and Dinçer, F. (2008a) Twin, triplet and quadruplet teratogens in benthic foraminifera from Antalya. Micropaleontology 54, 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriç, E., Yokeş, M.B., Nielsen, J.K., Görmüş, M., Avşar, N. and Dinçer, F. (2008b) Abnormal formations in Peneroplids: PeneroplisCoscinospira togetherness. Anales de Biologia 30, 17.Google Scholar
Meriç, E., Avşar, N., Yokeş, B., Tuğrul, A.B., Bayari, S., Özyurt, N., Balkis, N., Barut, I.F., Uysal, K. and Kam, E. (2008c) Morphological abnormalities in benthic foraminifers of the Antalya coast. Micropaleontology 54, 241276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriç, E., Avşar, N., Nazik, A., Tunoğlu, C., Yokeş, B., Barut, İ.F., Yücesoy-Eryılmaz, F., Tuğrul, B., Görmüş, M., Öncel, M.S., Orak, H., Kam, E. and Dinçer, F. (2008d) Saros Körfezi (Kuzey Ege Denizi) Harmantaşı Mevkii sualtı yükseltisi çevresinin foraminifer ve ostrakod faunası ile bu alandaki kaynakların fauna üzerine etkisi hakkında bulgular. MTA Dergisi 136, 6383.Google Scholar
Nigam, R., Saraswat, R. and Kurtarkar, S.R. (2006) Laboratory experiments to study the effects of salinity variations on benthic foraminiferal species—Pararotalia nipponica (Asano). Journal of the Geological Society of India 67, 4146.Google Scholar
Röttger, R. and Spindler, M. (1976) Development of Heterostegina depressa individuals (Foraminifera, Nummulitidae) in laboratory cultures. In Schafer, C.T. and Pelletier, B.R. (eds) First international symposium on benthonic foraminifera of continental margins. Halifax, NS: Maritime Sediments Special Publication 1, pp. 8187.Google Scholar
Sellier, D.E. and Civrieux, J.M. (1970) Mutaciones recieentes del genero Peneroplis 2008 f. relaciones filogenicas con otros Soritidae. Revista Española de Micropaleontologia 2, 512.Google Scholar
Sgarrella, F. and Moncharmont-Zei, M. (1993) Benthic foraminifera of the Gulf of Naples (Italy), systematics and autoecology. Bulletino della Società Paleontologica Italiana 32, 145264.Google Scholar
Sharifi, A.R.L., Croudace, W. and Austin, R.L. (1991) Benthic foraminiferids as pollution indicators in Southampton Water, southern England. United Kingdom. Journal of Micropaleontology 10, 109113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouff, V., Debenay, J.-P. and Lesourd, M. (1999a) Origin of double and multiple tests in benthic foraminifera: observations in laboratory cultures, environments. Marine Micropaleontology 36, 189204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouff, V., Geslın, E., Debenay, J.-P. and Lesourd, M. (1999b) Origin of morphological abnormalities in Ammonia (Foraminifera): studies in laboratory and natural environments. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 29, 152170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkiye Maden Sulari 3, Ege Bölgesi (1974) İ. Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Hidroklimatoloji Kürüsüsü, 335 s.Google Scholar
Yanko, V., Ahmad, M. and Kaminsky, M. (1998) Morphological deformities of benthic foraminiferal tests in response to pollution monitoring. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 28, 177200.Google Scholar