Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:08:22.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patients' Attitudes toward Hospital Ethics Committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Stuart J. Youngner ,
Claudia Coulton ,
Barbara W. Juknialis  and
David L. Jackson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is a growing concern in our society about the proper application of life-sustaining medical treatments. This concern has been stimulated by both the explosion in medical technology and the increasing emphasis on patients’ rights and autonomy in clinical decisionmaking. Technological progress enables us to prolong or sustain life, even when its “value” or “quality” is questionable. There is also increased concern, both within and outside the medical community, about the optimal process for making decisions to withhold or withdraw treatment.

Hospital ethics committees have been suggested as a possible solution to this problem. Although few hospitals have actually adopted ethics committees, and little is known about the way that they function or their effectiveness, there have been some recent efforts to study these issues. Despite the increasing recognition of patients’ wishes to know more about and to influence their medical care, there have been no reports about patients’ attitudes toward the role of ethics committees in decisionmaking.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 21 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Youngner, S.J., A National Survey of Hospital Ethics Committees, Critical Care Medicine 11(11): 902–05 (November 1983); President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Treatment: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions (U.S. Gov't Printing Office, Washington, D.C.) (1983) [hereinafter referred to as Deciding to Forego Treatment]; Cohen, C.B., Interdisciplinary Consultation on the Care of the Critically Ill and Dying: The Role of One Hospital Ethics Committee, Critical Care Medicine 10(11): 776–84 (November 1982) [hereinafter The Role of One Committee].Google Scholar
See e.g., Faden, R.R., Disclosure of Information to Patients in Medical Care, Medical Care 19(7): 718–33 (July 1981); Haug, M. Lavin, B., Public Challenge of Physician Authority, Medical Care 17(8): 844–58 (August 1979); Brody, D.S., The Patient's Role in Clinical Decisionmaking, Annals of Internal Medicine 93(5): 718–22 (November 1980).Google Scholar
See generally Veatch, R.M., Death, Dying, and the Biological Revolution (Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct.) (1976).Google Scholar
The Patient's Role in Clinical Decision-Making, supra note 2, at 721; Jackson, D.C. Youngner, S.J., Patient Autonomy and Death with Dignity, New England Journal of Medicine 301(8): 404–08 (August 1979); Siegler, M., Critical Illness: The Limits of Autonomy, Hastings Center Report 7(5): 12–15 (October 1977); Ackerman, T.E., Why Doctors Showid Intervene, Hastings Center Report 12(4): 14–17 (August 1982); Cassem, N., When to Disconnect the Respirator, Psychiatric Annals 9:84–93 (1979).Google Scholar
Eisendrath, S.J. Jonsen, A.R., The Living Will: Help or Hindrance? Journal of the American Medical Association 249(15): 2054–58 (April 1983); Note, The California Natural Death Act: An Empirical Study of Physicians’ Practices, Stanford Law Review 31:913, 940 (May 1979).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Suber, D.G. Tabor, W.J., Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from the Terminally Ill, Incompetent Patient: Who Decides? Part I, Journal of the American Medical Association 248(18): 2250–51 (November 12, 1982); Part II, Journal of the American Medical Association 248(19): 2431–32 (November 19, 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
In re Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976).Google Scholar
Critical Care Committee of the Massachusetts General Hospital, Optimum Care for Hopelessly Ill Patients, New England Journal of Medicine 295(7): 362, 364 (August 12, 1976).Google Scholar
Annas, G.J., In re Quinlan: Legal Comfort for Doctors, Hastings Center Report 6(3): 29–31 (June 1976); Hirsch, H.L. Donovan, R.E., The Right to Die: Medico-Legal Implications of In re Quinlan, Rutgers Law Review 30(2): 267, 273, 276 (Winter 1977); Levine, C., Hospital Ethics Committees: A Guarded Prognosis, Hastings Center Report 7(3): 25–26 (June 1977); Veatch, R.M., Hospital Ethics Committees: Is there a Role? Hastings Center Report 7(3): 22–25 (June 1977).Google Scholar
Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 1, at 160–70.Google Scholar
A National Survey of Hospital Ethics Committees, supra note 1, at 903.Google Scholar
Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 1, at 168–69.Google Scholar
Id. at 170.Google Scholar
See Robertson, J., Committees as Decisionmakers: Alternative Structures and Responsibilities, in Institutional Ethics Committees and Healthcare Decisionmaking (Cranford, R.E. Doudera, A.E., eds.) (Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.) (forthcoming 1984).Google Scholar
A National Survey of Hospital Ethics Committees, supra note 1, at 904.Google Scholar
The Role of One Committee, supra note 1; Optimum Care for Hopelessly Ill Patients, supra note 8.Google Scholar
The Role of One Committee, supra note 1 at 777 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 1, at 442 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
A National Survey of Hospital Ethics Committees, supra note 1, at 904.Google Scholar
Keenan, C., Ethics Committees: Trend for Troubling Times, Hospital Medical Staff 12(6): 2–8 (June 1983).Google ScholarPubMed