No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Thinking Like a Historian: Erie in the Dimension of Time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2001
References
American Law Institute.
1969. Study of the Division of Jurisdiction between State and Federal Courts. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Aurelius, Marcus. 1983. The Meditations. Translated by Grube, G. M. A.
Indianapolis, In.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Bailey, Mark Warren. 1997. Moral Philosophy, the United States Supreme Court, and the Nation's Character, 1860–;1910. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
10:249–71.Google Scholar
Brandeis, Louis D.
1985. The Louis Dembitz Brandeis Papers. American Legal Manuscripts from the Harvard Law School Library. Frederick, Md.: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Dawson, Nelson L.
1980. Louis D. Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and the New Deal. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R.
1995. Lawyers against Labor: From Individual Rights to Corporate Liberalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Daniel R.
2000. Willard Hurst and the Administrative State: From Williams to Wisconsin. Law and History Review
18:1–36.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr.
1994. Reflections on the Hart and Wechsler Paradigm. Vanderbilt Law Review
47:953–91.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E.
1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frankurter, Felix. 1986. The Felix Frankfurter Papers. American Legal Manuscripts from the Harvard Law School Library. Frederick, Md.: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix, and James Landis, M.
1928. The Business of the Supreme Court: A Study in the Federal Judicial System. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Freyer, Tony A.
1981. Harmony and Dissonance: The Swift and Erie Cases in American Federalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Georgetown University Law Center.
1995. The First 125 Years: An Illustrated History of the Georgetown University Law Center. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Law Center.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr., and Wechsler, Herbert. 1953. The Federal Courts and the Federal System. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1950. The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard
1978. Modern American Legal History. Madison: Wisconsin Public Radio.Google Scholar
Hylton, J. Gordon. 1998. David Josiah Brewer and the Christian Constitution. Marquette Law Review
81:417–25.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kutler, Stanley I.
1968. Judicial Power and Reconstruction Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lash, Joseph P.
1988. Dealers and Dreamers: A New Look at the New Deal. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
McCormick, Richard L.
1986. The Party Period and Public Policy: American Politics from the Age of Jackson to the Progressive Era. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Przybyszewski, Linda C. A.
1999. The Republic according to John Marshall Harlan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1968, The Crisis of Democratic Theory: American Thought between the Wars, 1919–;1941. Ph.D. diss. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1969. American Jurisprudence between the Wars: Legal Realism and the Crisis of Democratic Theory. American Historical Review
75:424–46.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1973. The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1976. Alexander M. Bickel and the Post-Realist Constitution. Harvard Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Law Review
11:521–64.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1992a. Geography as a Litigation Weapon: Consumers, Forum-Selection Clauses, and the Rehnquist Court. UCLA Law Review
40:423–515.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1992b. Litigation and Inequality: Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870–;1958. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1994. Rethinking Constitutional Change. Virginia Law Review
80:277–90.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1995. Learned Hand: The Jurisprudential Trajectory of an Old Progressive. Buffalo Law Review
43:873–926.Google Scholar
Purcell, Edward Aloysius Jr.
1999. Reconsidering the Frankfurterian Paradigm: Reflections on Histories of Lower Federal Courts. Law and Social Inquiry
24:679–750.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T.
1982. In Search of Progressivism. Reviews in American History
10:113–132.Google Scholar
Ross, William G.
1994. A Muted Fury: Populists, Progressives, and Labor Unions Confront the Courts, 1890–;1937. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spillenger, Clyde. 1992. Reading the Book of Judicial Canon: Alexander Bickel and the Book of Brandeis. Journal of American History
79:125–51.Google Scholar
Spillenger, Clyde
1993. Lifting the Veil: The Judicial Biographies of Alpheus T. Mason. Reviews in American History
21:723–34.Google Scholar
Thomas, William G.
1999. Lawyering for the Railroad: Business, Law, and Power in the New South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Michael. 1997. Who's Afraid of Henry Hart
Constitutional Commentary
14:175–207.Google Scholar
Wiecek, William M.
1969. The Reconstruction of Federal Judicial Power, 1863–;1876. American Journal of Legal History
13:333–59.Google Scholar
Willrich, Michael. 1998. The Two Percent Solution: Eugenic Jurisprudence and the Socialization of American Law, 1900–;1930. Law und History Review
19:63–111.Google Scholar