Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:36:16.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revolutionizing Rights: Epp's Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Doris Marie Provine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Fall 1999 , pp. 1125 - 1140
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cardozo, Benjamin. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W. 1992. The Politics of Justice: The Attorney General and the Making of Legal Politics. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Edward, L. Rubin. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modem State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Social Change. Law and Society Review 9:95–160.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Harr, Jonathan. 1995. A Civil Action. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Irons, Peter. 1998. The Courage of their Convictions. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kornbluh, Peter. 1998. Prisoner Pinochet: The Dictator and the Quest for Justice. The Nation, 21 December 1998, 11–21.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme-Court Decision-Making. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Litigation and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moray-Levine, Noga. 1998. Corporatism, Pluralism, and Interest Group Litigation: Outsiders and the Transformation of Environmental Disputes with Israel. Paper presented at 1998 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, 4–6 June, Chicago. On file with author.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen. 1980. Women's Organizations Use of the Courts. Lexington, mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M. 1984- Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Pacelle, Richard L. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Santaella, Manuel. 1992. Policías Ordenan Cacheos a Negros. El Mundo, 9 December, 1992, 21.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold, J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1981. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, and Stone, Alec. 1994 The New Constitutional Politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies 26(4):397–420.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Steve. 1990. The First Amendment, Democracy, and Romance. Cambridge, mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen. 1995. Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar