Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T21:13:58.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mobilizing Truth: Agenda Setting in a Transnational Social Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jamie Rowen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides a neoinstitutionalist account of how a transnational social movement (TSM) sets its agenda. A theoretical framework is presented to reveal how logics from the transnational and local organizational fields influence legal mobilization. To provide insight into how a TSM accommodates contradictory and competing logics within and between these fields, this article examines mobilization around a fact-finding commission, sometimes called a truth commission, to address the ongoing social and political divides in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). The findings, based on fieldwork conducted between 2009 and 2011, are used to develop the theoretical concept of a quasi-judicial medium, a legal body that, initially, will appeal to a variety of actors, but may be unable to adequately address existing divides. The conclusions point to further directions in the study of transnational legal mobilization, particularly the conditions under which the ambiguity of a movement strategy helps meet and/or moderate movement goals.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , Summer 2012 , pp. 686 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (02): 239–75.Google Scholar
Backer, David. 2003. Civil Society and Transitional Justice: Possibilities, Patterns, and Prospects. Journal of Human Rights 2 (3): 297–313.Google Scholar
Bailey, Carol A. 2007. A Guide to Qualitative Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Biserko, Sonja. 2010. Belgrade and Banja Luka Together for the Partition of Bosnia. Duh Bosne 5 (1): 1, 2.Google Scholar
Boesenecker, Aaron P., and Vinjamuri, Leslie. 2011. Lost in Translation? Civil Society, Faith‐Based Organizations and the Negotiation of International Norms. International Journal of Transitional Justice 5 (3): 345–65.Google Scholar
Boraine, Alex. 2001. A Country Unmasked: Inside South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bougarel, Xavier, Helms, Elissa, and Duijzings, Gerlachlus. 2007. The New Bosnian Mosaic: Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post‐war Society. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Brockett, Charles D. 1991. The Structure of Political Opportunities and Peasant Mobilization in Central America. Comparative Politics 23 (3): 253–74.Google Scholar
Brown‐Nagin, Tomiko. 2005. Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action. Columbia Law Review 105 (5): 1436–1528.Google Scholar
Buljugic, Mirna. 2007. No Progress for Sarajevo Truth Commission. Balkan Investigative Reporting Network, February 20. http://www.bim.ba/en/51/10/2327/ (accessed January 16, 2011).Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. Charli. 2007. Setting the Advocacy Agenda: Theorizing Issue Emergence and Nonemergence in Transnational Advocacy Networks. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Chapman, Audrey R., and Ball, Patrick. 2001. The Truth of Truth Commissions: Comparative Lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (1): 1–43.Google Scholar
Checkel, J. T. 1999. Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 84–114.Google Scholar
Daly, Erin. 2008. Truth Skepticism: An Inquiry into the Value of Truth in Times of Transition. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (1): 23–41.Google Scholar
De Greiff, Pablo. 2012. Theorizing Transitional Justice. In Transitional Justice: Nomos Li. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2006. Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2007. The Global Justice Movement: Cross‐National and Transnational Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Diani, Mario. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Delpla, Isabelle. 2007. In the Midst of Injustice: The ICTY from the Perspective of Some Victim Associations. In The New Bosnian Mosaic. Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in Post‐War Society, ed. Bougarel, Xavier, Helms, Elissa, and Duijzings, Gerlachlus, 211–34. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law. American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–76.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Suchman, Mark C. 2003. The Legal Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology 43:479–515.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, A. 2005. Civil Society in Bosnia Ten Years After Dayton. International Peacekeeping 12 (3): 406–19.Google Scholar
Freeman, Mark. 2006. Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger, and Alford, Robert. 1991. Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul, 232–66. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger, Alford, Robert, Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2004. Can Truth Accommodate a Divided Nation. Politikon 31 (2): 129–55.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark, and Merry, Sally Engle. 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graubart, Jonathan. 2008. Legalizing Transnational Activism: the Struggle to Gain Social Change from NAFTA's Citizen Petitions. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla. 2000. Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hazan, Pierre. 2005. Betting on a Truth Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Hensmans, Manuel. 2003. Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies 24 (3): 355–81.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2009. Framing the Local and the Global in the Anti‐Nuclear Movement: Law and the Politics of Place. Journal of Law and Society 36 (1): 94–109.Google Scholar
Hodzic, R. 2010.Living the Legacy of Mass Atrocities: Victims’ Perspectives on War Crimes Trials. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8 (1): 113–36.Google Scholar
Hughes, Edel, Schabas, William, and Thakur, Ramesh Chandra. 2007. Atrocities and International Accountability: Beyond Transitional Justice. New York: U.N. University Press.Google Scholar
Ivkovic, Sanja Kutnjak, and Hagan, John. 2006.Two Perspectives on Punishment: The Politics of Punishment and the Siege of Sarajevo: Toward a Conflict Theory of Perceived International (In) Justice. Law & Society Review 40: 369–91.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Wade. 2006. Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations. World Politics 58 (4): 623–51.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Craig, and Eckert, Craig M. 1986. Channeling Black Insurgency: Elite Patronage and Professional Social Movement Organizations in the Development of the Black Movement. American Sociological Review 51 (6): 812–29.Google Scholar
Kay, Tamara. 2011. Legal Transnationalism: The Relationship Between Transnational Social Movement Building and International Law. Law & Social Inquiry 36 (2): 419–54.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2002. Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspieter. 1996. The Organizational Structure of Social Movements in a Political Context. In Comparative Perspectives of Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings, ed. McCarthy, John and McAdam, Doug. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J. 1995.Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J., and Finci, Jakob. 2001. A Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. International Law FORUM du Droit International 3 (1): 50–58.Google Scholar
Kurzman, Charles. 2008. Introduction: Meaning‐Making in Social Movements. Anthropological Quarterly 81 (1): 5–15.Google Scholar
Leebaw, Bronwyn Anne. 2008. The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly 30 (1): 95–118.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allen, Kanfer, R., and Earley, C. 1990. Voice, Control and Procedural Justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:952–59.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan, and Tyler, Tom R. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Lofland, John, Snow, David A., Anderson, Leon, and Lofland, Lyn H. 2005. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
MacCoun, Robert. 2005. Voice, Control, and Belonging: The Double‐Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:171–201.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2002. Amnesty or Impunity? A Preliminary Critique of the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC). Diacritics 32 (3): 33–59. doi:10.1353/dia.2005.0005.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. 1998. Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., and Fischer, Michael M. J. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: an Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mazzei, Julie. 2011. Finding Shame in Truth: The Importance of Public Engagement in Truth Commissions. Human Rights Quarterly 33 (2): 431–52.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Scott, W. Richard. 2005. Organizations and Movements. In Social Movements and Organizations Theory, ed. Davis, Gerald. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2006. Law and Social Movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
McEvoy, Kieran. 2007.Beyond Legalism: Towards a Thicker Understanding of Transitional Justice. Journal of Law and Society 34 (4): 411–40.Google Scholar
Menkel‐Meadow, Carrie. 1991. Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co‐Opted or the Law of ADR. Florida State University Law Review 19:1–46.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working‐Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006a. New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (4): 975–95.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006b. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, and Stern, Rachel E. 2005. The Female Inheritance Movement in Hong Kong: Theorizing the Local/Global Interface. Current Anthropology 46 (3): 387–408.Google Scholar
Meyer, David, and Staggenborg, Susan. 1996. Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1628–60.Google Scholar
Miller, Zinaida. 2008. Effects of Invisibility: In Search of the “Economic” in Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (3): 266–91.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1973. Law and Social Change: The Semi‐Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Field of Study. Law and Society Review 7 (4): 719–46.Google Scholar
Morris, Aldon. 2000. Reflections on Social Movement Theory: Criticisms and Proposals. Contemporary Sociology 29: 445–54.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1991. Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1999. Globalization of Law: ADR as Soft Technology. American Society of International Law Proceedings 93:304–11.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2002. The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, and Grande, Elisabetta. 2002. Current Illusions and Delusions About Conflict Management—In Africa and Elsewhere. Law and Social Inquiry 27 (3): 573–91.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1984. Law in Action or Living Law? Back to the Beginning in Sociology of Law. Legal Studies 4 (2): 157–74.Google Scholar
Nettelfield, Laura. 2010. Courting Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague Tribunal's Impact in a Postwar State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nwogu, Nneoma V. 2007. Shaping Truth, Reshaping Justice: Sectarian Politics and the Nigerian Truth Commission. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Olsen, Tricia D., Payne, Leigh A., and Reiter, Andrew G. 2010. Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Omaskovic‐Devey, Anna, Carpenter, Charli, and Brownlie, Kyle. 2011.Agenda‐Seting in Transnational Networks: Findings from Consultations with Human Security Practitioners. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. 2006. From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women's Movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology 111 (6): 1718–61.Google Scholar
Peskin, Victor. 2008. International Justice in Rwanda and the Balkans: Virtual Trials and the Struggle for State Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard M. 2003. Transnational Civil Society and Advocacy in World Politics. World Politics 55 (4): 579–606.Google Scholar
Resnick, Danielle. 2009. The Benefits of Frame Resonance Disputes for Transnational Movements: The Case of Botswana's Central Kalahari Game Reserve. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest 8 (1): 55–72.Google Scholar
Risse‐Kappen, Thomas. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non‐State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotberg, Robert I., and Thompson, Dennis F. 2000. Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Souza. 2007. The Rise of the Global Left: The World Social Forum and Beyond. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Souza, and Garavito, Cesar. 2005. Law and Globalization from Below: Toward a Cosmopolitan Legality. New York: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Schabas, William, and Darcy, Shane. 2004. Truth Commissions and Courts: The Tension Between Criminal Justice and the Search for Truth. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Shaw, Rosalind, Waldorf, Lars, and Hazan, Pierre. 2010. Localizing Transitional Justice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pagnucco, Ron. 1997. Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D. 1988. Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. In From Structure to Action: Social Movement Participation Across Cultures, ed. Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspieter, and Tarrow, Sidney. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Somun, Azra. 2010. Reports on the Transitional Justice Experience in Bosnia and Herzegovina. International Journal of Rule of Law, Transitional Justice and Human Rights 1:56–63.Google Scholar
Sperling, Valerie, Ferree, Myra Marx, and Risman, Barbara. 2001. Constructing Global Feminism: Transnational Advocacy Networks and Russian Women's Activism. Signs 26 (4): 1155–86.Google Scholar
Stover, Eric. 2007. The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in the Hague. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Strang, David, and Soule, Sarah. 1998. Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24:265–90.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C., and Edelman, Lauren B. 1996. Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry 21 (4): 903–41.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2009. The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law. Law & Society Review 43 (3): 527–62.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2001. Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000.Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2008. Transitional Justice Globalized. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 (1):1–4.Google Scholar
Tepperman, Jonathan D. 2002. Truth and Consequences. Foreign Affairs 81 (2): 128–45.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H., and Ocasio, W. 1999. Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–43.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2006. Contentious Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Trubek, David. 1994. Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas. Case Western Law Review 44 (2): 407–98.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2005. Procedural Justice. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google Scholar
Van Antwerpen, Jonathan. 2008. Moral Globalization and Discursive Struggle: Reconciliation, Transitional Justice, and Cosmopolitan Discourse. In Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society, ed. Hammack, David C. and Heydemann, Steven, 95–136. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, Leslie, and Snyder, Jack. 2004. Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 345–62.Google Scholar
Weiss, Robert Stuart. 1995. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard. 1997. Human Rights, Culture, and Context: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard. 2007. Tyrannosaurus Lex: The Anthropology of Human Rights and Transnational Law. In The Practice of Human Rights, ed. Goodale, Mark and Merry, Sally Engle, 342–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zalaquett, Jose. 1994. Balancing Ethical Imperatives and Political Constraints: The Dilemmas of New Democracies Facing Past Human Rights Violations. Hastings Law Journal 43: 6–16.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N., and Ash, Roberta. 1966. Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and Change. Social Forces 44 (3): 327–41.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N., and McCarthy, John. 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar