We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Abrahamson, Shirley. 1995. Refreshing Institutional Memories: Wisconsin and the American Law Institute [The Fairchild Lecture]. Wisconsin Law Review199:51–38.Google Scholar
Elson, Alex. 1998. The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute. Law and Social Inquiry23(3):625–40.Google Scholar
Elson, Alex, and Shakman, Michael L.1994. The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tainted Process and a Flawed Product. Business Lawyer49:1761–92.Google Scholar
Hull, N. E. H.1990. Restatement and Reform: A New Perspective on the Origins of the American Law Institute. Law and History Review 855–96.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., Marshall, Lawrence C., and Zemans, Frances Kahn1992. Rule 11: Moving beyond the Cosmic Anecdote. Judicature75:269–72.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah F.1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.1996. Remarks pp. 321–327 in Proceedings, 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute, 1995, 321–27. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.Google Scholar