No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Vagrancy Law Challenge and the Vagaries of Legal Change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
This essay reflects on the relationship between the diffuse legal struggle to dismantle vagrancy laws during the 1960s and the larger history of twentieth-century social movement advocacy. In Vagrant Nation, Risa Goluboff persuasively links the demise of vagrancy laws to the cultural and constitutional turmoil of the 1960s. It is possible, however, to interpret that decade's upheaval, which rendered explicit social stratification increasingly vulnerable, as an impediment to a budding anti-vagrancy law consensus instead of a prerequisite for legal change. On this alternative reading, the uncoordinated legal efforts to overturn vagrancy laws in a decade dominated by more contentious litigation campaigns may have contributed to a tepid decision by the Supreme Court, which ultimately invalidated vagrancy laws on narrow legalistic grounds. Indeed, the relatively protracted dismantlement of the vagrancy law regime raises the question whether bottom-up constitutionalism lacks potency in the absence of an intermediary organization with a well-defined litigation strategy.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018
References
References
American Guardian. “California Vag Law to Face Test.”
American Guardian (Oklahoma City), July 19, 1935.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. “The Footnote.”
Northwestern University Law Review
83 (1989): 275–320.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. “The Supreme Court 1960 Term Foreword: The Passive Virtues.”
Harvard Law Review
75 (1961): 40–79.Google Scholar
Brown-Nagin, Tomiko. Courage to Dissent: Atlanta and the Long History of the Civil Rights Movement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Cushman, Barry. Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & K. Paul, 1966.Google Scholar
Douglas, William O. “Vagrancy and Arrest on Suspicion.”
Yale Law Journal
70 (1960b): 1–14.Google Scholar
Estlund, Cynthia. “Are Unions a Constitutional Anomaly?”
Michigan Law Review
114 (2015): 169–234.Google Scholar
Fisk, Catherine, and Jessica, Rutter. “Labor Protest Under the New First Amendment.”
Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law
36 (2015): 277–329.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. “Preferred Freedoms: The Progressive Expansion of State Power and the Rise of Modern Civil Liberties Jurisprudence.”
Political Research Quarterly
47 (1994): 623–53.Google Scholar
Goluboff, Risa. The Lost Promise of Civil Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Goluboff, Risa. “Lawyers, Law, and the New Civil Rights History.”
Harvard Law Review
126 (2013): 2312–35.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. “The Constitution of Aspiration and ‘The Rights That Belong to Us All.’”
Journal of American History
74 (1987): 1013–34.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria C. Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. Law and the Conditions of Freedom in Nineteenth Century America. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Kalven, Harry. The Negro and the First Amendment. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Katz, Michael B. In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America. New York: Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard.
The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality
. New York: Knopf, 1975.Google Scholar
Law Revision Commission. Recommendations and Study Made in Relation to a Public Enemy Law for New York. New York: Law Revision Commission, 1935.Google Scholar
Leuchtenburg, William E. The Supreme Court Reborn: The Constitutional Revolution in the Age of Roosevelt. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Linzer, Peter. “The Carolene Products Footnote and the Preferred Position of Individual Rights: Louis Lusky and John Hart Ely vs. Harlan Fiske Stone.”
Constitutional Commentary
12 (1995): 277–303.Google Scholar
Lusky, Louis. “Footnote Redux: A ‘Carolene Products’ Reminiscence.”
Columbia Law Review
82 (1982): 1093–1109.Google Scholar
Maidment, Richard A. The Judicial Response to the New Deal: The United States Supreme Court and Economic Regulation, 1934–1936. New York: Manchester University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Montgomery, David. “Wage Labor, Bondage, and Citizenship in Nineteenth-Century America.”
International Labor and Working-Class History
48 (1995): 6–27.Google Scholar
New York Call. “‘Frameup’ Seen in New Coast Anti-Labor Case.”
New York Call, January 28, 1919.Google Scholar
Pope, James Gray. “How American Workers Lost the Right to Strike, and Other Tales.”
Michigan Law Review
103 (2004): 518–53.Google Scholar
Rabban, David M. Free Speech in its Forgotten Years, 1870–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Seo, Sarah. “Democratic Policing Before the Due Process Revolution.”
Yale Law Journal (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Sherry, Arthur. “Vagrants, Rogues and Vagabonds—Old Concepts in Need of Revision.”
California Law Review
48 (1960): 557–73.Google Scholar
Stanley, Amy Dru. “Beggars Can't Be Choosers: Compulsion and Contract in Postbellum America.”
Journal of American History
78 (1992): 1265–93.Google Scholar
Tiedeman, Christopher Gustavus. Treatise on the Limitations of Police Power in the United States: Considered from Both a Civil and Criminal Standpoint. St. Louis, MO: F. H. Thomas Law Book Co., 1886
Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel. In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the ACLU. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. “From Left to Rights: Civil Liberties Lawyering Between the World Wars.”
Law, Culture, and the Humanities (2016a). Pre-published May 18, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872116641871.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. The Taming of Free Speech: America's Civil Liberties Compromise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016b.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. “The Right to Work and the Right to Strike.”
University of Chicago Legal Forum
2017 (2018): 513–36.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. “Class and Classification: The Role of Disgust in Regulating Social Status.” In The Empire of Disgust: Prejudice, Discrimination and Policy in India and the US, edited by Hasan, Zoya, Huq, Aziz Z., Nussbaum, Martha C., and Verma, Vidhu. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Primary Documents
American Civil Liberties Union Papers, 1912–1990, Mudd Library, Princeton University (Gale-Cengage). Reference includes box/folder location.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 516/22. Letter from A. A. Heist (Director, ACLU Southern California Branch) to Herbert Levy, November 10, 1949.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 750/22. Letter from Herbert Monte Levy to Al Wirin, February 1, 1952.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 929/18. Letter from Stephen Hartigan (Acting President, Correction Officers Benevolent Association) to John Paul Jones, January 16, 1951.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 971/25. Letter from Rowland Watts to George W. Shodoan, December 14, 1960.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 1216/831. Letter from Charles W. Wolfram to Lawrence Speiser, October 22, 1963.Google Scholar
ACLU-P 1731/2. Letter from Marvin M. Karpatkin (Acting Legal Director) to William Reynard, March 3, 1967.Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union Archives: The Roger Baldwin Years, 1917–1950, Mudd Library, Princeton University. Reference includes reel/volume location.Google Scholar
ACLU-A 136/928A. Letter from James M. Carter to ACLU, December 4, 1936.Google Scholar
ACLU-A 136/928B. Letter from Clinton Taft to Harry Poth Jr., December 24, 1936.Google Scholar
ACLU-A 150/1032. Letter from Ernest Besig to Lucille B. Milner, April 5, 1937.Google Scholar
Papers of Grenville Clark in the Dartmouth College Library, ML-7, Rauner Special Collections Library, Hanover, NH. Reference includes box/folder location.Google Scholar
GCP 80/36. Letter from Louis Lusky to Grenville Clark, November 14, 1938.Google Scholar
Briefs Cited
Brief for American Civil Liberties Union and Louisiana Civil Liberties Union as Amici Curiae. Arceneaux v. Louisiana, No. 76, 376 U.S. 336 (1964).Google Scholar
Petitioners' Brief. Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, No. 70-530, 405 U.S. 156 (1972).Google Scholar
Respondent's Brief. Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, No. 70-530, 405 U.S. 156 (1972).Google Scholar
Cases Cited
Arceneaux v. Louisiana, 376 U.S. 336 (1964).Google Scholar
Cady v. Village of Barnesville, 4 Ohio Dec. Rep. 396 (1878).Google Scholar
Carlson v. California, 310 U.S. 106 (1940).Google Scholar
City of St. Louis v. Fitz, 53 Mo. 582 (1873).Google Scholar
City of Watertown v. Christnacht, 39 S. D. 290 (1917).Google Scholar
Edelman v. California, 344 U.S. 357 (1953).Google Scholar
Edwards v. California, 314 U.S. 160 (1941).Google Scholar
Ex Parte Smith, 13 Ohio N. P. N. S. 278 (1912).Google Scholar
Ex Parte Taft, 284 Mo. 531 (1920).Google Scholar
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Lancaster v. Reed, 207 S. W. 868 (Mo. App. 1919).Google Scholar
Lanzetta v. New Jersey, 306 U.S. 451 (1939).Google Scholar
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156 (1972).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87 (1965).Google Scholar
Territory of Hawaii v. Anduha, 48 F.2d 171 (9th Cir. 1931).Google Scholar
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).Google Scholar
Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 (1960).Google Scholar
Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940).Google Scholar
United States v. Carolene Products Company, 304 U.S. 144 (1938).Google Scholar
Wainwright v. New Orleans, 392 U.S. 598 (1968).Google Scholar
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).Google Scholar
Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507 (1948).Google Scholar