Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:13:46.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

finish variation and grammaticalization in a signed language: How far down this well-trodden pathway is Auslan (Australian Sign Language)?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2015

Trevor Johnston ,
Donovan Cresdee ,
Adam Schembri  and
Bencie Woll
Trevor Johnston
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Donovan Cresdee
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Adam Schembri
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Bencie Woll
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Language variation is often symptomatic of ongoing historical change, including grammaticalization. Signed languages lack detailed historical records and a written literature, so tracking grammaticalization in these languages is problematic. Grammaticalization can, however, also be observed synchronically through the comparison of data on variant word forms and multiword constructions in particular contexts and in different dialects and registers. In this paper, we report an investigation of language change and variation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Signs glossed as finish were tagged for function (e.g., verb, noun, adverb, auxiliary, conjunction), variation in production (number of hands used, duration, mouthing), position relative to the main verb (pre- or postmodifying), and event types of the clauses in which they appear (states, activities, achievements, accomplishments). The data suggest ongoing grammaticalization may be part of the explanation of the variation—variants correlate with different uses in different linguistic contexts, rather than social and individual factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 117 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, & Sandler, Wendy. (2005). The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2):301–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Charlotte, & Cokely, Dennis. (1980). American Sign Language: A teacher's resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, Philip, & Syea, Anand (eds.). (1996). Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Bank, Richard, Crasborn, Onno, & van Hout, Roeland. (2011). Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language & Linguistics 14(2):248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Brita, & Dahl, Osten. (1994). Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Bache, C., Basboll, H. & Lindberg, C. E. (eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology. Vol. 12. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. 397–442.Google Scholar
Boyes-Braem, Penny, & Sutton-Spence, Rachel (eds.). (2001). The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. (1983). Marking time in British Sign Language. In Kyle, J. G. & Woll, B. (eds.), Language in sign: An international perspective on sign language. London: Croom Helm. 10–31.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, & Pagliuca, William. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, John K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D. (1978). Sign language and creoles. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press. 309–331.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D, & Gough, Bonnie. (1999 [1972]). Some unfinished thoughts on FINISH. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(1):67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. (2002). On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Wischer, I. & Diewald, G. (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. (2011). Grammaticalization in African languages. In Narrog, H. & Heine, B. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 696–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. (2002). World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, & Kuteva, Tania. (2005). Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, E. C. & Heine, B. (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry. (1995). The polygrammaticalization of FINISH in ASL. Master's thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. (2012). Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (eds.), Sign languages: An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter. 816–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, & Shaffer, Barbara. (2002). Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Meier, R. P., Cormier, K. A., & Quinto-Pozos, D. (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1):359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. (1989). Auslan: The sign language of the Australian deaf community. PhD dissertation, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. (2001). Nouns and verbs in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): An open and shut case? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 6(4):235–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, Trevor. (2010). From archive to corpus: Transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(1):104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. (2012). Lexical frequency in sign languages. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 17(2):163–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, Trevor. (2014). The Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines. [Last updated June 2014]. Available at: http://www.auslan.org.au/about/annotations/. Accessed June 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, & Schembri, Adam. (2004). Grammaticization and iconicity in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Paper presented at the Sixth High Desert Linguistics Conference, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, November 4–6, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, & Schembri, Adam. (2006). Issues in the creation of a digital archive of a signed language. In Barwick, L. & Thieberger, N. (eds.), Sustainable data from digital fieldwork: Proceedings of the conference held at the University of Sydney, 4–6 December 2006. Sydney: Sydney University Press. 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, & Schembri, Adam. (2007). Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T, van Roekel, J, & Schembri, A. (in press). The conventionalization of mouth actions in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Language and Speech.Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine. (2001). Aspects of verbal valency in ISL. PhD dissertation, Trinity College, University of Dublin.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Bayley, Robert, & Valli, Clayton. (2001). Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, & Valli, Clayton. (1989). Language contact in the American deaf community. In Lucas, C. (ed.), The sociolinguistics of the deaf community. San Diego: Academic Press. 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, William J. (1972). Conversational sign language II: An intermediate-advanced manual. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Maroney, Elisa. (2004). Aspect in ASL: A typological-functional analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 30(1):244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit. (1999). A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(1):43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit. (2012). Word classes and word formation. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (eds.), Sign languages: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliuca, William (ed.). (1994). Perspectives on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, & Quer, Josep. (2010). Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Brentari, D. (ed.), Sign languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, & Steinbach, Markus. (2006). Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Linguistics in Potsdam 24:3–98. Available at: http://www.ling.uni-postdam.de/lip/. Accessed April 5, 2007.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, & Steinbach, Markus. (2011). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (eds.), Handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 683–695.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali. (1996). Nothing in context: Variation, grammaticalizaton and past time marking in Nigerian Pidgin English. In Baker, P. & Syea, A. (eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions. Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. Westminster: University Press. 71–94.Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian. (2005). Event structure in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Johnston, Trevor, Cormier, Kearsy, & Fenlon, Jordan. (2013). Sociolinguistic typology and sign languages. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE), Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Johnston, Trevor, & Goswell, Della. (2006). NAME dropping: Location variation in Australian Sign Language. In Lucas, C. (ed.), Multilingualism and sign languages: From the great plains to Australia. Vol. 12. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press. 121–156.Google Scholar
Schwager, Waldemar, & Zeshan, Ulrike. (2008). Word classes in sign languages: Criteria and classifications. Studies in Language 32(3):509–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, Amy L. (1999). Grammaticalization in American Sign Language. Language Sciences 21:105–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaountzaki, Galini. (2005). Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Centre for Deaf Studies, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted, & Newport, Elissa L. (1978). How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press. 91–132.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel, Woll, Bencie, & Allsop, Lorna. (1990). Variation and recent change in fingerspelling in British Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 2:313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. (2011). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (2011). Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, James A. (2010). Variation in linguistic systems. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warren, Katherine Norton. (1978). Aspect marking in American Sign Language. In Siple, P. (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research. New York: Academic Press. 133–159.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, Rossini, Paolo, & Pizzuto, Elena. (2012). Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (eds.), Sign languages: An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 312–331.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, & Wilcox, Phyllis. (1995). The gestural expression of modality in ASL. In Bybee, J. L. & Fleischmann, S. (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Zhonghua, & McEnery, Anthony. (2004). A corpus-based two-level model of situation aspect. Journal of Linguistics 40(2):325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. (2003). Aspects of Türk Isaret Dili (Turkish Sign Language). Sign Language & Linguistics 6(1):43–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro. (2009). Along the time line: Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17:99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar